A friendly message to Heels-Up Harris:
Are you shitting yourself yet?
Do you need a diaper?
(Page 55 in PDF related)
>it will of course get buried unless highlighted by anons?
Correct. I cannot notable myself.
see >>14041739
Also, there may be other US attorneys in Biden's cabinet. You can tell from the flavor of the dialog that the judge and the gov't. attorney are being very careful not to reveal anything substantive about the investigation. I'm actually surprised the judge put that mention in his order. I suspect that single mention was there so we would find it.
I would have copypasta'd it, but the PDF is all images. Here's a transcription just to prove I'm not lazy:
—p. 55 relevant paragraph
Here, as discussed, no party was required to make a good cause showing before designating any particular discovery materials as confidential. Moreover, there is significant public interest: the Government has convened a grand jury to investigate a serious crime (potentially involving multiple victims), which from its inception has garnered extensive publicity, and which (most recently) includes troubling allegations of misconduct on the part of Government officials, including a then-United States Attorney who is now a member of the President's Cabinet. The Court agrees with the Government that, because the investigation is not publicly known, "the ordinary exercise of grandy jury power [i.e., to subpoena witnesses to testify and to produce documents] . . . would implicate and invite the very risk of disclosureand the possibility of alerting potential criminal targets that they are under investigation, causing them to destroy evidence, flee from prosecution, or otherwise seriously jeopardize the Investigationthat caused the Government to proceed via subpoena [to Boies Schiller] and its related Application." (Gov't Letter Br. at 5.)
–
I guess I can tipe, too.
fucking purple text.
McAfee Antivirus ran on about 85% of all government machines.
What kind of information do you think he would have had?
spoiler: all of it
Baker - regarding the Heels-up Harris / Guiffre / Maxwell thing, you might want to include this one for food-for-thought of other anons.
The target in question may not be Harris, but it has to be a US Attorney during the duration of the Guiffre case who is now in Biden's cabinet. Harris is just the most obvious one, but it could easily be some other US attorney on Biden's cabinet.
>The only date I found was 2019 and that means the Trump cabinet.
retardation is correctable, anon.
read the document.
The time frame they're talking about is during the Guiffre litigation.
Also, the timeframe relevant to the judges statement is NOW.
>one rumor was that he donated laptops
not a rumor, anecdotal from the horse's mouth.
see >>14042149
You've put 14042028 and 14042144 under the wrong line-item. Move them up a line. (Harris convo - not Journal of the American Medical Assn.)
>all os software is built on backdoors.
Everything starting with UNIX. Before that was Multics, which was demonstrably secure. UNIX was produced as the first in a line of intentionally insecure operating systems.
>BBBut muh linux & vpn
I can't blame them for not knowing. It takes a lot of research, reading of declassified shit and access to good industry veterans to learn a lot of it.
>all Intel cpu's are ~~supposedly~~ definitely back-doored
Apple has it's own chips so they can backdoor the ARM.
assume everything that comes out of a large company is actively spying on you in every way possible.
industrial espionage.
political espionage.
cabal fuckery at the highest levels.
on the bright side:
it is possible to build a computer with totally compromised hardware and make it 100% secure. it is surprisingly easy, actually. Wouldn't add much to the cost. Certain functions wouldn't be at peak speed, but it can easily be done so nobody would notice.
Hardware is easy to mitigate against if you are the hardware designer. Software is only difficult because the average asshat wants everything that already exists and it will take a long time to replicate the software landscape with secure/transparent operating system(s).
but it can be done and it isn't all that difficult for competent engineers.
I expect it.
if you expect to start with what currently exists (operating systems, standards, etc.), then you're fucked.
the whole fucking tech industry needs to be discarded and rebuilt from scratch.
>Imagine the level of surveillance they have now with the smart door-bell cameras and google and amazon smart-hubs and the rest of the internet of things people have at home
But they can't use any of that against me because I'm not visible to any of it. So they can spy on retards, but the ones they really should really want to be watching have become invisible.
>Don't blame me, I never went to school
I like to say "I am unencumbered by a classical education."
>Am I completely missing something?
Yes. The judge's decision was just rendered. Like now…2021.
If you're using C, you're fucked.
You want a safe language that doesn't allow pointer use except in very specific circumstances which can be VERY easily audited and 100% transparent.
I'm convinced Bell Labs (AT&T, K&R) designed C to be very easy to write code containing exploits.
If you don't believe me, look up the Air Force research project attacking Multics in the late 60's. That's where the cabal learned every single way to attack a computer. They took that knowledge, weaponized it and spun off a group to produce UNIX.
It is what they always do.
>there's a lot to be rebuilt – but not everything.
I disagree, but that's a conversation for somewhere in the future.