>>14042681

when the fade methodologies were be being foisted upon programmers, and the software 'engineers' were run by Human Resource and by the venture capitalists, the 'tool venders' would switch to a new paradigm all at once, and abandon the old. It was a way to constantly haze the programmers. Most software was not engineered. Software engineering was 'heroics' and 'last minute bravado'. They actually would brag about untested releases and last minute fixes.

they would constantly erode the old paradigms and foist new ones on users.

They moved people into new methods but ignored the content and context.

they forgot to do real engineers.

software engineers were either humiliated or made rich. And no one who knew how to write rock-solid and well engineered code was given much hope. Or they would haze you to give them a brillient product, but fire you after its first revision.

the 'culture' of it was intentionally broken.

you couldn't get a 'coding' job without paying a head hunter 20 percent of your first years salary.

and they wouldn't keep you for more than a year.

they would have pensions that didn't vest for 4 years. Only the priniples in a startup would be there that long. And if you said 'i don't want to put into this pension fund, I'll never see the match' they'd put your name onto the next RIF.

it goes on and on.

in the shill-world-view

'free speech must be secured' which is code for 'I have been given notice that I am a problem and I don't care I'll do what I want'

to the shills their inability to flood their nonsense script psy-ops is a hampering of their ability to run their psy-ops.

now they have to use their IP hops to just stay in the game. They can't use them as sock puppet 'players' in a long run effort.

and their content has turned into 'boo hoo hoo, I'm banned'.

but they are still here saying it, so how banned are they, really?

not very.

free speech means that you don't jam the channel. monopolizing the board by flooding it so no others can use it to communicate is not 'free speech'. It's bullying.

55 posts of art project girls from the early 2000-ohs isn't not 'political speech' it's fetish post grooming for susceptible clickers and trying to mess with the heads of the other anon.

the creepy banter about the porn girls as if they are slave-women for auction is not political speech, it's a presentation of a fallen personality who is given over to covetousness which is put into public view.

Real people don't behave like that.

remember, it's not just that he takes a series of images of his pooch with a 'come hither' puppy petrusion leg kick look, he posts them here too.

he posed the dog. he took the photo. he stored the photo. He logged in . he posted the dog foton in hundreds of different formats. He spent a lot of effort tyring to humilate and defame the ones who pointed out 'your dog photo is offensive'.

and then, when he gets banned for being a flood spammer, he cries 'censorship'.

is that a normal person? All over a crappy picture of a dog that really shouldn't have been taken in the first place. or if taken, not kept. or if kept, not posted. or if posted not defended.

the list goes on.

and posted HUNDREDS of times.

it's not organic.

this isn't a person being banned, it's a shill team and all their efforts.