Anonymous ID: c74078 May 13, 2018, 11:56 p.m. No.1404953   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1404923

Yeah, looks to me like they're saying it was a targeted move to try to dislodge the Q group. We were discussing what it all meant at the time the Q post was dropped. And then the POTUS tweet as well? Yeah, don't fall for the trap. Q and POTUS still want us here.

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 12:30 a.m. No.1405084   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

By the way, JS responded about being featured on IW. He seems clean and is ready to move on, too. I like the title he chose. "Stay the Course."

https://youtu.be/xQVu3ywd2RU

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 12:40 a.m. No.1405122   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5139

>>1405102

Looks that way. AJ, too. But it's kinda difficult to make anything stick when their target is anonymous, don't you think? They'll just say, "But I had no idea Q was him!" I'm guessing they'll suffer attrition. It can't go well to go up against Q.

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 1 a.m. No.1405189   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5206 >>5220

>>1405184

It's still there. It's this:

 

Board owner, mods, and other patriots:

Sincere thanks for all that you do.

You are true heroes.

Long overdue - my apologies.

There will be a day (within the next few months) that a scary but safe personalized message finds its way to you on multiple platforms recognizing your contributions.

We thank you for your service.

Godspeed,

Q

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 1:16 a.m. No.1405240   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

If Facebook is getting in trouble for keeping info about users, what about Google keeping info about where people have been? I was messing around with a map today, and it said I'd been there last year. (I've been there more recently, actually.)

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 1:38 a.m. No.1405311   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1405302

The text is all there, including some of what has been deleted. Some images I've reviewed are republished, too. So what do you think? Should I set up a flagging feature? Then maybe I can put it all out there, with the caveat that it's community policed.

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 1:51 a.m. No.1405338   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1405307

>The only reason I don't release it all is because a bunch of porn fags have polluted the data. I don't want to republish anything like that.

 

just edit out the porn images. If anyone questions the edits, post the original as well. Problem solved, we are all adults here.

And I do put a content warning on the site already. Finding all of the porn is not trivial. There are probably approaching 2 million posts in the database now. Tell you what. I'll set up a reporting feature and then release the whole set. If someone finds something, they can flag it. That will hide it immediately from further views until reviewed. But once reviewed, it can't be flagged again.

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 2:21 a.m. No.1405393   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1405362

Even if this all has been a larp (and I don't think it has been), it has had an impact, and a good one at that. The effects are real, for sure. But then add in some of the proofs we've had, and those who have been here for a while know that what we are working for is from the highest levels.

Anonymous ID: c74078 May 14, 2018, 2:59 a.m. No.1405474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5601

>>1405451

How many words have really been a problem? As it stands, I've said in the program's description that I reserve the right to do it, and I would make it obvious if I did. I've thought about replacing words with some other random word, Mad Libs style.