>>14049652

>.bitchute.com/video/HMIAkUf0tzYu/

Actual farmer here. This guy is full of crap. I have no idea what he's talking about, but he's clearly not a farmer. He talks about "every farmer I know"–never says he is one. Talks about the farmers would lose 35 cents per pound. We sell by the bushel, not the pound. And we make deals directly with the grain elevator. The USDA is not involved with what we get paid for our crops. Looks like a rumor that has taken off, but it's not true, at least not in my neck of the woods. Which is row crops (grain) in the southern US. Nope! Calling BS.

>>14049717

All I can tell you with 100% certainty is that this is not true in grain. I will say with 95% certainty that it's probably not true with any crop. But I honestly don't know what goes on with produce. There are always people with the stupid idea that the government pays us to not grow stuff. But that's not correct. The whole idea of a subsidy is to correct for market distortions and theoretically help the farmer make up for money he needs to keep his operation going when the market prices are too low–but obviously you need a crop to work with. It's been my experience people who don't know anything about farming really, really, reallllllly like to talk all about it like they know. And they so don't know.