>>>14066019
>same for >>14065933 not notable
>quit with the fuckery and faggotry.
Notables get added into past breads, but this is what upsets you? This means you believe that bakers should be welcome to change notables of other bakers?
>no, it means that it's not notable.
neither are the changed ones, so, its a dogs dinner we get to accept. This one AND the one where past notables get changed. Fun innit?
>which is why we should just do away with them altogether. or at least have tighter parameters of what belongs there. they've turned into just msm news regurg and stupid fucking twats.
No, anons should be paying attention and take some actual personal responsibility for the baking and protecting notables etc. Enjoy your day.