Gold shall destroy FED

Andrew MacGuire interviewed about the effects of Basel III.

Gold became a Tier I asset.

Paper gold a Tier 3. Paper gold - huge counter-party risk.

Open interest has nearly halved this year as paper contracts unwound.

Gold leverage 100:1. USD:gold.

MacGuire indicates one of the purposes of Basel III is to further USDollar hegemony, and that BIS is furthering this.

But, BIS works for "them" at the top of the triangle.

Q says gold shall end the Fed. We presume Q meant the Federal Research and/or Rothschilds banking system.

MacGuire also discussed his reasons for believing that physical gold markets will take over pricing of gold, and that BIS is trying to get control of that. Also his belief that the gold price will rise.

Which brings up how much gold does US have? Russia? China?

Does the US actually have gold in the vaults of US Treasury, or was it all leased out? If leased out, has Treasury been able to re-hypothecate 8,133 tons of gold from the leasees and/or from purchases from the miners? How could that have been kept quiet?

If China leased the gold - it's been melted and re-minted w/ Chinese stamp. It ain't coming back from there.

Do we go back on gold standard, with gold revalued much higher than the current value on the books?

In a systemic Rothschild banking system collapse, does China rush in with a Chinese crypto?

Q tells us we do have the gold (8133 tons).

CHI is estimated to have between 8000-30,000 tons

So ANONS — if Rothschilds banks under Basel III have to unwind paper suppression game and gold rises, and Basel III makes gold tier 1 - does US Treasury then revalue gold, as MacGuire suggests?

If so, at what price? FMV, or enough to wipe out the trillions in debt?

>>14066995 (p/b)

>Doesn't necessarily mean the price is wut is going to do it…most likely speaking to the decades of games they have played with it.

And they don't really own it either

Correct, Fed does not own the gold, just certificates.

That's why I mentioned the US Treasury (think in terms of Ft. Knox) and the gold leases.

Ending the Fed implies ending Rothschilds system ala USDollar hegemony.

Agree price of gold alone isn't going to end Fed. It looks like the price suppression scheme via the paper/futures contract game is coming to an end.

So ANONS, why do the Illuminati (or whatever name you want to call the 8000 people at the top of the triangle) want to end the paper suppression scheme by ordering those at the BIS to change the rules?

If US doesn't have the gold and China does, the money power shifts to China.

But Q told us yes, we have the gold.

>>14066995 (p/b)

>>14066964 (p/b)

>Doesn't necessarily mean the price is wut is going to do it…most likely speaking to the decades of games they have played with it.

And they don't really own it either

Correct, Fed does not own the gold, just certificates.

That's why I mentioned the US Treasury (think in terms of Ft. Knox) and the gold leases.

Ending the Fed implies ending Rothschilds system ala USDollar hegemony.

Agree price of gold alone isn't going to end Fed. It looks like the price suppression scheme via the paper/futures contract game is coming to an end.

So ANONS, why do the Illuminati (or whatever name you want to call the 8000 people at the top of the triangle) want to end the paper suppression scheme by ordering those at the BIS to change the rules?

If US doesn't have the gold and China does, the money power shifts to China.

But Q told us yes, we have the gold.

MacGuire suggests BIS trying to control physical market. Anyone think the BIS etal will try to seize private gold in a power grab attempt?