notable >>14066143 (lb) some reading material on our overlords, the Phoenicians

so we're notablingMILES MATHISas a reliable source of long term history?? Same guy who argues its not satanists, its muh[crypto]jooz? Same 'guy' that some argue is a team of DISINFO writers, probably Tavistock?

• • • • • • *

… as a tack-on he [MM] repeated his bald assertion that pizzagate (pedogate) is ‘faked,’ meanwhile claiming that David Seaman (who has taken heat for being all over Pizzagate) has ‘gone into hiding’ – two easily verifiable lies, btw.

So everyone/everything I mentioned or quoted – Smallstorm, Weiss, Fetzer, Seaman, FE, plus pizzagate – were all in the MM post. That the post followed directly on the heels of mine (by a week or so) equals the extreme likelihood that MM is keeping an eye on my sorry ass and what I have to say. The fact that my readership is small (though loyal and smart) makes this doubly interesting….

… I’ve been threatening for months to do an exposè on MM, proving beyond reasonable doubt that he is what I say he is, i.e., acommittee of spooks(possibly out ofTavistock)out to misdirect/misinform you, but meanwhile (like any ‘good’ LH) providing valuable truths — in the case of MM, extremely valuable, which is why he should be of extreme interest to anyone with a real interest in HTWRW (how it really works).

And indeed, the MM essay on the Manson/Tate ‘events’ (truly worth a ‘cautious’ read) is undoubtedly ‘correct’ in its conclusion that the ‘murders’ and even the trial itself were fraudulent; it was an early example of Sandy Hook and the spate of frauds to come, the Boston bombing being another example. I characterize the essay as ‘correct’ rather than ‘accurate’ since there are several factual ‘errors’ in the piece, although none that reverse the ultimate conclusion that the Manson event was a psy op, one of the most ambitious in recent American history. (Keep in mind that the murders/trial were not false flag events in the sense of 9/11 but rather ‘history theater’ (to coin a term) — the ‘crime’ itself was apparently faked, not who committed it (as in a false flag).

I’ve lost count of the times MM prefaces an essay (invariably a particularly outrageous one) with a strong suggestion that the reader go back and read his Manson/Tate essay before carrying on with the current one;this has become a ‘tell’that ‘the current one’ is disinformation; he is literally pointing out the M.O. of a LH by suggesting we read some (real) truth so we’re more easily sucked into the whooper to come. Let’s quote from the first paragraph of the essay that first tipped me to MM’s status as ambitious psy op – his essay claiming that JFK faked his own assassination:

‘If the thesis [of this essay] is too far-out for you at a first glance… I also recommend my very long paper on the Tate/Manson event. The photographic evidence I compiled for that one exceeds even the photographic evidence here—which is extensive.’

http://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-miles-mathis-part-one/

back to workfagging