>>14068583 (fyi) don't think it was u, the BV was super arrogant/dick like attitude for no apparent reason. Perhaps that BV has other issues. It was out of hand and EVERYBODY was a shill from what I gathered. I spent most of the day catching up on notables so unsure what exactly happene but had some diggs to add to something in notables. Boom! Instaban! That's when I found out about the ban issue. Tried reason but that was fruitless. If BV truly had THIS anon's hash history the truth would be crystal clear.
Anon got accused (falsely) by BV yesterday about something anon never did nor even responded to in any way. Rather than respond when innocence proclaimed via appeal, the appeal itself got another ban then BV used a short portion to "flash" like some hotshot. It ain't right. Something about the "I know your hash history" has an error somewhere. All of this should be there but is it? Anon is not a shill. More a digger/helper/lurker/learner.
Still pretty chapped about it.