tyb
So are you apparently. Feel free to point out the faults in my logic.
You are claiming a federal crime based on IP hashes. As you have stated you cannot see IP addresses, this is required to link the crime to an individual. A stream of evidence would need to be established that connects the IP address of the post to the IP hashing system that creates the IP hash, to the post that claimed to be the author and identifier of the connecting post that you provided an IP hash screenshot for. This ignores time and place requirements. This is a minimal splash damage scenario. Any glowie can start posts here that YOU can then claim are federal crimes with screenshots of IP hashes, that can then be used to compel waktins to the previously described disclosures. My complaint has nothing to do with any side of any ghost war, it has to do with BV's claiming fed crimes and using screenshots of internal mod tools to claim they have identified the perpetrator of the crime. For the purposes of issuing a warrant the screenshots are probable cause and BVs are staff. Get it yet? Nothing to do with teams or some shadowy weed long con plan, just do your job without the verbose shit talking so you don't open up the board to feds, hell keep your shit talking up if you have to, just don't do it with a capcode, staff.
I take your point but staff can actually do damage.
No I think you are avoiding my point. You claimed crime and contacted LEO, the only claim you have is IP hash, that is not evidence, for it to be evidence a warrant would need to be executed to prove the IP actually made the post. So, BV claims crimes, reports it to LEO, was advised it would need to go to fed, claims they would get ip logs from watkins. Those facts are undeniable. Any competent sort of defense is going to need to confirm the ip logs, which again means what I previously described. Whatever road you want to take to get there, you claim crimes, report to leo, claim ip logs can prove your accusation. I am just saying what would happen next. What part is incorrect.?
Vague questions and assertions all you got there, projection single poster?
Appeal to authority
Ad hominem
Appeal to majority
Ridicule.
See I can do it too. I have made my warning and you have proved you do not wish to discuss it in good faith. I have no other motives.
Maybe if you didn't accuse every post critical of you as an IP hop of another ghost you are sparring with I wouldn't have to prove my lurking to have a say. My motives for going from lurking to engaging this bread is to warn you against your actions. Thanks to how this board works we are stuck in a lose-lose situation, I am not advocating for any actions from anyone other than you. As always my motive is to get you to admit mistakes. I do not know of any actions from anyone other than you that could improve this board, every action that has perceived positives (you being summarily removed as BV for example) also creates worse landmines (gives power to perma-bitches, hence why I am talking to you in good faith and performing actions to differentiate myself from them)
TLDR; Get a fucking attention span there fishy.
Yeah you lump me in with tranny and anyone else that is complaining about you as some sort of team or op. You even suggested that it was partly why you modified an OP post with zero warning. Why would you ban me I break no rules and do nothing that can be considered spam? You have yet to admit a single mistake though. That is my only goal, partly so I can go back to coding and baking for this board when required or when it strikes me, partly because admitting mistakes makes a better leader, and like it or not we are stuck with you.
Nah thanks I don't take orders from you, you have not engaged me in the same manner I have tried to engage you yet, I am not going to go digging down into old breads to have another disingenuous reply. You made a mistake on my OP and you made a mistake dragging this board's drama to leo as staff of said board.