Anonymous ID: 957307 July 8, 2021, 5:24 a.m. No.14079596   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14079585

makes me furious. When comics really started pushing it a few years agoโ€ฆi had to stop. It was too much and to know they are actually pushing these ideas on the most impressionable, there are reasons they are hated and rightfully so. Lego is another example of them pushing these ideasโ€ฆwhen lego started it was something boys and girls could use for their imagination and now they push this propaganda, hate hate hate it.

Anonymous ID: 957307 July 8, 2021, 6:06 a.m. No.14079743   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9780

>>14079706

however there was precedent set in some monsanto cases, where crops were cross fertilized, about who owned them. I just can not remember off hand if that was a US case or not. But i do recall something about it. Not a great digger, but some places called the geneticliteracyfoundation say it is false, but i do remember cases from maybe 8 years ago or so that said otherwise. Did find this from canada though

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/percy-schmeiser-monsanto-legal-battle-1.4771673

Anonymous ID: 957307 July 8, 2021, 6:23 a.m. No.14079819   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9826

>>14079780

yeah and my thought is that depending on how the language of these suits happen, and i know there have been some in the us as well, those who have had a genetic modification may be considered property of said companies, yes hyperbole and perhaps a stretch, but also considering that they consider us chattel to begin with would it really be a shock at this point. Plus since its all experimental there might be a caveat in there as well. To many gears are in motion at this point, to pinpoint but i could see evil using this as a plot point in this movie easily.