TYB
Collecting #17816
Riccardo Bosi - Masks, Lockdowns, Mandatory Vaccines why they are not legal in Australia
(15:02 mins)
Bio Security Act 2015 - https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00196
Privacy Act 1988 - https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00242
In the comments section
MyFriendFlicka,
Any law that purports to make it mandatory for a person to submit to a Covid-19 vaccination is invalid.
In 1945, the then Chief Justice Latham held that quarantine laws “may be regarded in most, if not all, of its aspects as a form of public health legislation”.
The Commonwealth has the power under section 51(ix) of the Constitution to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’.This is a power granted to the Commonwealth. Not the States.
At [257] of the decision, Latham CJ held that the Commonwealth “could not pass a law citizens of the States…to submit to vaccination or immunisation”.
So there areseveral important things that flow from the High Court decision.
1/ Vaccinations and Immunisation are matters that fall within the category of ‘quarantine’.
2/ Only the Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’ under section 51 [ix] of the Constitution.
3/ The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunisation ( which are quarantine matters).
4/ The States have no power to make laws with respect to quarantine, including matters dealing with vaccinations and immunisation (as Latham CJ held that these are ‘quarantine’ matters).
https://rumble.com/vjd4p7-australiaone-party-riccardo-bosi-masks-lockdowns-mandatory-vaccines.html
Can You Catch A Virus? Original Video
February 17, 2021 By Tom Barnett
(11:20)
https://tombarnett.tv/2021/02/17/can-you-catch-a-virus-original/
GEORGENEWS, [08.07.21 17:22]
SAVE AMERICA
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
JULY 8, 2021
BEDMINSTER, NJ
ICYMI: "Trump goes to war against the DC RINOs in the Republican Party"
Read the full article by Andrea Widburg with American Thinker here.
###
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/03/trump_goes_to_war_against_the_dc_rinos_in_the_republican_party.html
https://t.me/georgenews/1647
GEORGENEWS, [08.07.21 17:31]
SAVE AMERICA
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
JULY 8, 2021
BEDMINSTER, NJ
ICYMI: "What About His Gaffes? Joe Biden Bumbles His Way Through G7 Summit"
Read the full article by Andrew Stiles with the Washington Free Beacon here.
###
https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-gaffes/
https://t.me/georgenews/1648
GEORGENEWS, [08.07.21 17:51]
SAVE AMERICA
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
JULY 8, 2021
BEDMINSTER, NJ
ICYMI: "Trump Town Hall Boosts Sean Hannity’s Ratings to the Top of the Charts Wednesday"
Read the full article by Marisa Sarnoff with Mediaite here.
###
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/trump-town-hall-boosts-sean-hannity-s-ratings-to-the-top-of-the-charts-wednesday/ar-AALG2T9
https://t.me/georgenews/1649
March 9, 2021
Trump goes to war against the DC RINOs in the Republican Party
By Andrea Widburg
People who don't like Trump claim that, with his attacks on Mitch McConnell and against other disloyal Republicans, he's simply settling scores for no purpose but self-gratification. People like me, who do like Trump, see a bigger, more important strategy: he's getting rid of the conservative wing of the Democrat party (not a typo) and is positioning the Republican Party to represent a true populist, pro-American conservatism. Trump made another big move in that direction on Monday, when he told his 75 million supporters to stop sending money to the GOP.
To recap, Trump opened his war against the RINO wing of the Republican Party in mid-February, when he went nuclear on Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, calling him a useless hack. This was obviously payback for Mitch McConnell's disgraceful attacks against Trump following the impeachment.
Trump wasn't done once he'd had his say about McConnell. Two weeks later, at CPAC, Trump did two things. First, he said he had no intention of abandoning the Republican Party. And, second, he named those nominal Republicans who need to be primaried right out of politics because their allegiance is to the Democrats and their anti-American policies, rather than to America and Americans. Trump made clear that he's going to restore a pro-American Republican Party.
Trump's next moves in the game were to announce that he was going to campaign against Alaska's Sen. Lisa Murkowski, whose commitment to conservatism is almost entirely illusory, and to have his lawyers send a cease and desist letter to the Republican National Committee (RNC). In the letter, Trump's lawyers demanded that the RNC stop using Trump's name and likeness in their campaign materials.
Unsurprisingly, the RNC responded that it fully intended to use Trump's name and likeness in its campaign materials. This means that it intends to promote uniparty RINOs by associating them with a hugely popular Republican president:
In a Monday letter to Trump attorney Alex Cannon, RNC chief counsel J. Justin Riemer said the committee "has every right to refer to public figures as it engages in core, First Amendment-protected political speech" and said "it will continue to do so in pursuit of these common goals."
But he maintained that Trump had also "reaffirmed" to the chair of the RNC, Ronna McDaniel, over the weekend "that he approves of the RNC's current use of his name in fundraising and other materials, including for our upcoming donor retreat event at Palm Beach at which we look forward to him participating."
The Gateway Pundit understands what the RNC plan is:
Just think of all the small donors on fixed incomes who will think that they are helping Trump when instead they will be helping monsters like Mitch McConnell or Liz Cheney!
Trump must have anticipated this response — after all, as a public figure, it'll be mighty hard for him to claim that he has sole control over his image and words — so he shot back with a response that must have horrified everyone at the RNC, from the lowliest secretary to Ronna McDaniel herself. He released an official statement telling the faithful not to donate to the RINOs. Instead, he says, they should donate directly to his Save America PAC:
Trump with a message and an explicit ask to send him money, and not other Republicans: pic.twitter.com/R62agEjmLP
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) March 9, 2021
Things are about to get interesting, for Trump has openly anointed himself as kingmaker for muscular conservatism in America.
Image: Donald Trump "I'm just in the way" meme.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/03/trump_goes_to_war_against_the_dc_rinos_in_the_republican_party.html
What About His Gaffes? Joe Biden Bumbles His Way Through G7 Summit
VP Kamala Harris also embarrasses USA in first trip abroad
President Joe Biden's performance at the G7 summit in England has done little to allay concerns about his mental competence, to say the least. The 78-year-old president has bumbled his way through the summit, embarrassing the United States in the process and raising questions about his capacity to lead.
In one video clip making the rounds, Biden appeared disoriented as he wandered into an outdoor seating area. His patient wife, Dr. Jill Biden (EdD), ultimately came to his rescue and led him away.
Over the weekend, Biden embarrassed himself during a photo op with other world leaders by urging the summit's host, British prime minister Boris Johnson, to introduce President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa. Video from the event clearly showed Johnson introducing Ramaphosa before Biden interjected.
"And the president of South Africa," Biden said after Johnson finished introducing the leaders.
"And the president of South Africa, as I said earlier on," Johnson replied.
"Oh, you did. I'm sorry," a bewildered Biden told the host, embarrassing his country on the world stage.
Biden's relationship with Johnson was already strained after the president gifted the prime minister a $6,000 bicycle, which could be construed as an insult in the United Kingdom. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, telling someone to get "on your bike" is "a rude way of telling someone to go away."
The gift was also an insult to the millions of Americans who rightly view cyclists as a menace to society.
Further questions were raised about the president's mental fitness when Biden snapped at a reporter during a media availability. Asked a simple question about his administration's decision to keep some Trump-era tariffs and sanctions in place, the president leaned over and grumbled into the mic.
"A hundred and twenty days. Give me a break. Need time," Biden growled before shuffling off the stage.
Biden's embarrassing display continued when he repeatedly mixed up the countries of Syria, in the Middle East, and Libya, in North Africa.
"We could work together with Russia, for example, in Libya," Biden said during an address to summit attendees. "We should be opening up the passes to be able to go through and provide food assistance and economic—I mean, vital assistance to a population that's in real trouble."
As the White House later confirmed, Biden was actually talking about Syria, where Russia has helped the ruthless regime of President Bashar al-Assad cling to power since the outbreak of civil war in 2011. Biden went on to confuse the two countries a couple more times during his address.
Biden was not the only prominent American official to embarrass his country abroad. Vice President Kamala Harris was criticized from all sides for bumbling her way through a recent trip to Mexico and Guatemala. Even some Democrats were perplexed by the VP's inability to answer simples questions about her plans to visit the U.S. border with Mexico.
Celebrity journalist Abby Phillip of CNN described Harris's performance as "cringeworthy" and noted that "her allies in the White House and elsewhere are watching it and just kind of wondering, ‘What is going on?'"
Harris's failure to suddenly evolve into a better politician than the one who failed to get a single vote in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary is even more alarming given the precarious status of Biden's cognitive health.
It's also very embarrassing for America.
https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-gaffes/
Trump Town Hall Boosts Sean Hannity’s Ratings to the Top of the Charts Wednesday
Fox News’ Sean Hannity, boosted by a much-watched town hall with former President Donald Trump and Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, took the top spot in the ratings race Wednesday, according to Nielsen data.
Hannity was most-watched in both total viewers, with 3.54 million, and in the valuable demographic of viewers age 25-54, with 550,000—marking a 25% uptick in total viewers for the show, and also beating all broadcast prime time shows. Tucker Carlson Tonight was second, with 3.13 million total viewers and 512,000 in the demo. The Five was third in total viewers, with 2.72 million, and fifth in the demo, with 398,000. The Rachel Maddow Show was fourth in total viewers, with 2.57 million, and also in the demo, with 400,000. The Ingraham Angle was fifth in total viewers, with 2.36 million, and third in the demo, with 434,000.
Unsurprisingly, the boost from Hannity’s town hall pushed Fox News into a big lead in prime time overall, averaging 3.01 million total viewers and 499,000 in the demo. MSNBC was second in total viewers, with 1.99 million, and third in the demo, with 278,000. CNN was third in total viewers, with 1.03 million, and second in the demo, with 280,000.
In total day, Fox was first with 1.66 million and 279,000 in the demo. MSNBC was second in total viewers, with nearly 1.2 million, and third in the demo, with 165,000. CNN was third in total viewers, with 809,000, and second in the demo, with 194,000.
In the early morning, Fox and Friends won with 1.13 million total viewers, and 190,000 in the demo. MSNBC’s Morning Joe was second, with 923,000 total viewers, and 126,000 in the demo. CNN’s New Day was third, averaging 441,000 total viewers, and 74,000 in the demo.
The post Trump Town Hall Boosts Sean Hannity’s Ratings to the Top of the Charts Wednesday first appeared on Mediaite.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/trump-town-hall-boosts-sean-hannity-s-ratings-to-the-top-of-the-charts-wednesday/ar-AALG2T9
Arizona Conservatives Take Action, [08.07.21 11:56]
Cold Water Audit Updates from Ken Bennett: No Decertification and More Than 2,089,563 Ballots
Ken Bennett joined John Fredericks last night to review the status of the AZ audit and throw cold water on a number rumors:
• Ken reiterated that there will be no preliminary report. The full results will be released a few weeks after the audit is completed, probably sometime in August
• They have completed both the hand count and the forensic analysis of the ballots — he did not comment on the status of the machine evaluation, the envelope signature review, the canvass, or any down ballot examination
• The team is currently double and triple checking the tabulation, the “aggregation” of every ballot, and the ~90K tabulation sheets
• Ken says “they actually sent us more than 2,089,563 ballots” because of the duplicate ballots; there were about 20K - 25K damaged ballots that had to be duplicated and they are rechecking those numbers to make sure nothing is double counted
• If the audit reveals problems, Ken believes the Governor will call a special session next fall so that the legislature can address those issues
• John Fredericks asked Ken if the legislature has the power to decertify the electors. Ken responded: “No. There is no provision in AZ law currently to decertify the results canvassed last December.” Ken suggested they may need to create a new law to enable that in the future.
Watch 📺🔗 JF Radio (https://www.outsidethebeltway.net/corey-lewandowskis-fight-back-now-america-still-fights-for-trump/)
*Interview with Ken Bennett starts at minute 15:10
https://t.me/ArizonaConservatives/2298
One America News Network, [08.07.21 13:40]
One-on-One with President Trump following announcement of class action lawsuit against Big Tech
(7:30 mins)
https://rumble.com/vjlbkj-one-on-one-with-president-trump-following-announcement-of-class-action-laws.html
CodeMonkeyZ, [07.07.21 21:35]
I do not want my old twitter account resurrected.
If twitter restores it, i will be deleting it immediately.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/664
Tearful Michael Avenatti sentenced to 2.5 years in prison for trying to extort Nike
https://t.me/TrumpChannel/1744
HHS Secretary Defends Door-to-Door Vaccine Checks
The latest from Biden's radical HHS secretary
(2:25 mins)
https://rumble.com/vjldm7-hhs-secretary-defends-door-to-door-vaccine-checks.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab
FLASHBACK: Schumer Hints at Intel Community Revenge Plot Against Trump
(0:56 seconds)
https://rumble.com/vjl5xt-flashback-schumer-hints-at-intel-community-revenge-plot-against-trump.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab
Paul Sperry Names Lt. Michael L. Byrd As The Officer Who Shot Ashli Babbitt
1/4
By Paul Sperry, Real Clear Investigations
July 7, 2021
Most police departments — including Washington, D.C.’s Metropolitan Police — are required to release an officer’s name within days of a fatal shooting. Not the U.S. Capitol Police, which is controlled by Congress and answers only to Congress. It can keep the public in the dark about the identity and investigation of an officer involved in a shooting indefinitely.
Which is what happened with the Jan. 6 shooting of Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed protester in the U.S. Capitol riot who was fatally wounded by a plainclothes police lieutenant as she attempted to breach a set of doors inside the building.
For the past six months, as Congress has proposed legislation to reform police departments across the country, the Capitol Police has stiff-armed government watchdogs, journalists and even lawyers for Babbitt, who have sought the identity of the officer and additional details about the shooting. The USCP still refuses to release his name, in stark contrast to recent high-profile police shootings around the nation.
In February, USCP issued a press release promising to “share additional information once the investigation is complete.” But Justice Department investigators closed their probe in April, clearing the officer of criminal wrongdoing in Babbitt’s death, which the medical examiner ruled a homicide. And last month, the D.C. Police — which shares jurisdiction with the Capitol Police and has led the investigation into Babbitt’s shooting — concluded its own internal review of the shooting without making any findings, according to spokeswoman Kristen Metzger.Still, USCP continues “stonewalling the public," according to the head of the police union.
“That’s my department’s attorneys for you,” United States Capitol Police Labor Committee Chairman Gus Papathanasiou told RealClearInvestigations. “There is definitely a transparency issue. The department needs to answer those questions. They are stonewalling the public.”
Withholding the name of the officer who fired the fatal shot — the only round fired by anyone during the four-hour siege — has bred speculation on the Internet and led to the mistaken identification of at least one officer. USCP Special Agent David Bailey was wrongly fingered as the shooter on social media and conservative news sites.
After RCI called attention to the false rumor in an email to USCP, followed by a story on the issue, USCP's communications chief officially knocked it down as “misinformation.”
Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio — Lt. Michael L. Byrd — and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won’t confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn’t denying it.
In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing. Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts — which, according to its website, provides “the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken” — recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as “Officer Byrd.” His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (see video embed further below).
Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.
In addition, Byrd’s resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting — a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.
Following the shooting, Byrd’s Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.
2/4
“Officer Byrd” is named in a videotape of House testimony (around 39:20).
Phone calls and emails to Byrd, who lives in Maryland where he remains on paid administrative leave, went unanswered. His attorney would neither confirm nor deny that the 53-year-old Byrd is the shooter, and warned that disclosing his name poses a safety risk to the officer.
The Babbitt family is frustrated USCP won’t release any information about the incident other than the terse and vaguely written statement it issued on Jan. 7: “[A] sworn USCP employee discharged their service weapon, striking an adult female.”
Because Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests, the family is suing the D.C. Police “for documents that identify the officer who shot Babbitt … as well as notes and summaries of what the officer said regarding the shooting and the reasons he discharged his weapon.” (The D.C. Police has led the investigation into Babbitt’s shooting.) A hearing before a judge is scheduled for Sept. 3. Washington-based watchdog Judicial Watch also is suing for the records.
Aaron and Ashli Babbitt, from "Justice for Ashli Babbitt" on Twitter (@ForAshli.) Aaron Babbitt plans a wrongful-death lawsuit over her killing.
“They sit back and they completely refuse to release the name of their own police officer that was involved in a shooting of an unarmed woman,” said Ashli Babbitt’s husband, Aaron. "It’s ridiculous, it’s absolutely ridiculous.”
Babbitt has hired a Maryland lawyer specializing in police-abuse cases who plans to file a wrongful-death lawsuit against USCP and the officer, seeking at least $10 million in damages.
The attorney, Terry Roberts, said he has received no information from USCP about the case, even though he contacted the department's general counsel in May. But he said an investigator in his office has positively identified the shooter from a “painstaking” analysis of photos and videos taken by journalists and witnesses inside the Capitol, as well as from tips from citizens and other information.
He said a key witness is Taylor Hansen, a freelance journalist who films protests around the country and was outside the Speaker’s Lobby with Babbitt, a 35-year-old Air Force veteran, when she was shot. Hansen claims to have identified Byrd as the officer who opened fired on Babbitt, striking her in the lower left shoulder.
"Hansen was present when Ashli was shot,” Roberts told RCI. "He has spoken with my investigator. He provided a reliable and accurate account of what he saw; he also made a video recording, which proved useful."
Roberts said he is not ready to name the officer as a defendant in the lawsuit until he meets federal regulations for filing personal-injury claims against government agencies and employees, which could take several more weeks. However, he told RCI, “He’s a guy who left his service revolver in a bathroom.”
From "Justice for Ashli Babbitt" on Twitter. Slain in the U.S. Capitol at 35, she was an Air Force veteran.
In February 2019, Lt. Byrd was investigated for leaving his department-issued Glock-22 firearm unattended in a restroom on the House side of the Capitol, even though the potent weapon, which fires .40-caliber rounds, has no manual safety to prevent unintended firing. Fortunately, the abandoned gun was discovered by another officer during a routine security sweep. A Glock-22 was used in the Babbitt shooting.
3/4
Byrd addressed the blunder at a roll call the following morning, reportedly telling fellow officers that he would “be treated differently” because of his rank as a lieutenant.
At the time, Malecki assured the press that “appropriate actions will be taken” against Byrd. Asked recently what disciplinary actions were administered, the USCP spokeswoman declined comment.
Unlike other police forces, USCP does not have to disclose records on police misconduct.
More than 700 complaints were lodged against Capitol Police officers between 2017 and 2019, but brass won’t say what the alleged violations were or how the department resolved them. They also won’t disclose how many complaints are in any individual officer’s file.
While the USCP has an inspector general, he does not make reports public, unlike other agency watchdogs. His report on Jan. 6 remains secret.
Critics say the 193-year-old agency is in dire need of reform. They point out that even the Secret Service complies with FOIA requests and releases reports and audits by its internal watchdog. The Capitol Police, in contrast, won’t even reveal how many sworn officers it has on hand.
“Unlike the [D.C. Police] and the vast majority of local police forces, the USCP provides little public information about its activities,” complained Daniel Schuman, policy director of the D.C. watchdog group Demand Progress, in a recent letter to the heads of the congressional panels who have oversight authority over USCP.
D.C. law requires police to identify the officer involved in a police shooting within five business days after an officer-involved death or serious use of force. Officials must publicly release the names and body-camera recordings of all officers involved in the death or use of force. The law does not cover the Capitol Police, however, even though D.C. Police work in conjunction with that agency on homicide cases and fatal traffic accidents.
The Babbitt shooting has thrust this double standard into the national spotlight.
Some lawmakers on the USCP oversight committees are clamoring for changes, starting with the immediate release of the name of the officer who shot Babbitt. They allege that Capitol Police are protecting an officer who killed an unarmed citizen from public scrutiny.
4/4
“In many instances, when a law enforcement officer kills an individual for any reason, that officer's name is publicly released. But not in the case of Ashli Babbitt,” said GOP Rep. Paul Gosar, who sits on the House Oversight Committee. “Instead, there is a determined effort to cover up the full circumstances of this homicide.”
Mark Schamel, the Washington attorney defending the officer, warned that revealing his client’s name could put his life in jeopardy. He said the officer has received “credible" death threats and has gone into hiding. He would not provide further details about the type of threats or whether they have been reported to the FBI. Schamel also declined to say if authorities have provided the officer a protective security detail.
Asked about any threats made against Byrd, USCP General Counsel Tad DiBiase told RCI in an email that "one of our officers has received death threats, threats to his family, and numerous vile, racist sentiments directed at the officer." Without elaborating, he said "these threats are currently under active investigation by the USCP and the FBI."
The only publicly known threat made against the officer who shot Babbitt came from Garret Miller, who was arrested in Texas in part because of threats he made two weeks after participating in the Capitol riot. However, Miller circulated the wrong photos of the officer on Facebook, falsely identifying Officer Bailey, who is also African American. Miller remains in federal custody.
The FBI and USCP declined to answer when asked if any threats have been directed against Lt. Byrd specifically.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/07/07/naming_the_capitol_cop_who_killed_jan_6_rioter_ashli_babbitt_779601.html
Lt. Michael L. Byrd As The Officer Who Shot Ashli Babbitt
What if I told you that the FBI raided someone’s home in Maricopa County in connection to a cyber attack on election data❓
On the morning of November 5, as the 2020 election hung in the balance, Arizona federal agents raided a two-story house in Fountain Hills, Maricopa County.
The agents were looking for evidence of a cyberattack on an unnamed organization and stolen voter data. They left with eight hard drives, three computers, and a bag of USB sticks. The resident of the property, a 56-year-old IT expert named Elliot Kerwin, was served the warrant.
According to the warrant, investigators were looking for records, information, and communications related to the office’s:
*Login credentials and accounts.
*Voter registration records and information, including protected voters’ data.
*The transfer, sharing or dissemination of voter registration records and information, including protected voters’ information.
*Unauthorized access to the office’s website and computer systems.
*Attempts or threats to damage computer systems.
Does this have anything to do with the breach of election data that Matt Deperno says Katie Hobbs has been covering up❓
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2020/12/04/exclusive-the-fbi-is-investigating-voter-data-theft-in-this-key-2020-election-battleground/?sh=457840f234a4
@KanekoaTheGreat
Forbes
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2020/12/04/exclusive-the-fbi-is-investigating-voter-data-theft-in-this-key-2020-election-battleground/?sh=457840f234a4
Exclusive: The FBI Is Investigating Voter Data Theft In This Key 2020 Election Battleground
Maricopa County, a key battleground in the
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/749
nice notables, bakes
someone did something
military controlled demolition with a missile into the pentagon?
notable
Remember Avenatti's tweet made about President Trump not going to be there for much longer and then missile happened?
KEK!
Is this Gretchen Whitmer without her makeup???
YES!! that one, ty
whoa, thinking about who he is really connected to… because they let this happen, they didn't like him talking out of school…
ooff
White House helped broker deal to shield the president's son, Hunter Biden, from information about who is buying his paintings (listed for up to $500,000) so they could "avoid" ethics issues.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9769107/White-House-helped-Hunter-Biden-reach-deal-buyers-paintings-confidential.html
I watched that in real time, he tweeted it and then the missile thing happened.
I don't know where he was but do recall something about Texas
what is tz?
This is a copy of the US DOJ's new "assurance" to the UK High Court on Assange
Directly after the language stating their false offer to not impose SAMs on Assange, is a stipulation clarifying that they retain the right to do so if they want to.
The equivalent of saying, 'we wont torture him immediately, but we retain the right to torture him if we want to later.'
To go further, below the highlighted section is their other false promise of incarcerating him overseas if they cannot convince the UK courts that the US prison system can keep him alive. Note that it is only an offer after he has exhausted the entire legal process and also he has to apply for it from within our broken system.
Both of these thinly veiled moves, are designed to circumvent the UK Courts ruling against extradition.
Julian Assange, exposed the war crimes of the US Government, and they have absolutely no right to imprison him, now, or later.
Their case, is a sham, and the further they dig in, the worse they look to the waking world.
https://t.me/QAnonJohn17/10232
oh time zone… derp
When Q posted that, I went into all of Avenatti's previous posts before they were wiped, and clearly put two and two together. He knew before hand.
7 Clever Ways To Scare Off Biden's Door-To-Door Vaccine Evangelists
The vaccine door-to-door evangelists are coming for you! Luckily, we at The Babylon Bee are extremely anti-social, so we've got some great ways to scare off the vaccine missionaries trying to get you to accept Dr. Fauci as your lord and savior.
Try one of these and let us know how it goes!*
-
Answer the door while casually cleaning your AR-15. - "Greetings, agent of the government! What can I do for you today?"
-
Wear a MAGA hat. - Works every time.
-
Sneeze violently and say you're starting to lose your sense of taste. - "Does this apple taste like anything to you? Everything is starting to taste bland to me…"
-
Smear sacrificial ice cream on your doorposts to appease Biden. - It worked for the Israelites.
-
Show them your fully assembled LEGO Capitol Building set. - A true sign that you're a deranged terrorist – they'll run away screaming.
-
Smile and offer to shake their hand. - Nothing scares the pro-SCIENCE crowd like interacting like a normal human being.
-
If all else fails, release the hounds. - Hopefully you've had your "Release the Hounds" button installed already.
*The Babylon Bee is not responsible for any death, dismemberment, or imprisonment in a reeducation camp resulting from these techniques.
https://babylonbee.com/news/7-clever-ways-to-ward-off-bidens-door-to-door-vaccine-evangelists