Anon from UK thread here with a stupid question I’m afraid to ask: Why do the Qagg and Qalerts Q post aggregator sites show posts #781 and 782 as posts #784 and 785? Did I miss some posts that got added or what? I’ll admit I’ve had my head down, nose to the grindstone working on dating the London pics and we pretty much had nicknames for the pics and such (eg RB, ROT1,2,3, LISA, CH1,2,3), but now that we have dated the pics as far as humanly possible, we want to try to decode them and find connections, “read the map”.

Who changed the numbering of the posts?

Do anons recommend an accurate aggregator site that follows the original Q numbering?

>>14085059

Can’t figure how to search on that site. Mebbe coz not compatible for phonefags?

>>14085074

What do you see in the graphic for post 1724 Anon? At Qagg, I see this:

>>14085074

Thank you for answering and offering a new site. I guess I’ll ask UK Baker or Boatfag what they think. Cheers, Anon.

>>14085155

Good. At least you’re seeing what I am seeing and I’m not some idiot. Well at at least we know to look out for misnumbering.

Thanks very much for your answers anon.

Cheers.