>>14086474 PB
>Q source wrote Matthew and Luke…
WOW. The Q source of the Bible is an imagined document that was used by the gospel authors. It was invented to explain the differences and similarities between the gospels.
Scholars invented the myth a a Q document because they admit that they cannot read the OT the way Jesus and the NT authors do.
The differences between them are simple to explain. The early church was first Hebrew. As the Greeks joined, they wanted to be Christian but not Jewish, So they were given 'Christianity-lite'; Paul even said he chose to give them nothing but Christ and him crucified, and the council in Jerusalem gave them some basic rules.
They did not learn the deep mystery of Christ in the OT. Christ taught his disciples how to see it, and they forgot. He gave them the Holy Spirit to remind them of what he taught. As they applied the method of interpretation taught by Jesus, their understanding of teh OT shifted from a literal history, to a game of "Where's Waldo" finding Jesus in every verse.
Mark wrote first and is the least capable in uncovering the mystery which was hidden from the beginning. He started with the preaching of John. They sent it to the Greeks as a snapshot of the current scholarship. Ten to fiftenn years later, Matthew pushed the understanding of the beginning to Abraham. Luke pushed it to Adam, and John pushed it to the first three words of Genesis. Each was 'thrown over the wall' at the Greeks.
Everything in the gospels has a source in the OT and is an interpretation of it through the lens of the hermeneutic Jesus taught.