Having a hell of a time posting today. Is the site being messed with?
>>1408825
That is not a valid assumption.
I've found their images shopped!
Why do you think they branded it "GETTY"?
Who is "Getty?" That makes it far from official?
Likely why "Q" pointed out his photos are "original"
meaning they were not shopped.
Look at this NIST photo I found today.
Awful / Terrible shop job.
I'd think it was an f-ed up energy weapon causing the distortions BUT the problem extends up the side of the smoke, and you can see where the pixilations were distorted - with the naked eye, no enlargement needed.
If people are shocked shocked ! that "alex jones" is a dickhead. Maybe get the smelling salts out for photo fakery examinations?
Likely "Q" is trying to teach / or point people, to learn how to recognize image fakery. It's KEY.
Is that an honest name? Getty?