>>>14102974
Oh it isnt QRB.
This is fucking beautiful.
Happy to help.
>>14089443 (OP)
So anons worked the [faggot{s}] out?
Word.
>Patriot Pidgeon
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE [YOU] OF THIS SUBJECT ARE INDEED NOT A PATRIOT PIGEON, LARP!
<Maybe One Day….
But hopefully not; and that [you]'ll just … do [you] or something.
Why try to claim …
What the fuck…
Why not just waste time investing in crypto?
Moar profitable?
Fuck it. Shill op exposed,''NEXT!™''
>>>14105573
My bad if I thought the trickle effect was like a legit thing or something….
''SHILLOPFOR BTFOFOREVER!''
This is essential info anons, voting for permie status… as if consensus wasnt already achieved!
>Which is why they are so upset over the Globals. I was the first BV that started to investigate them and their patterns. I bet this shit has been apparent from the beginning of 8kun minimum.
Anon shure noticed the faggotry surrounding bakers.
I mean I get it the message must be preserved but…
Flash that faggot baker card again shill let's just put it that way.
Idk it was more of a pride thing than duty I mean
They aren't stepping up to bake legitimately now so that shows all anons need to see right?
>Clowns run the show.
>You've been warned.
Still freer than many boards and access across the internet.
Go try to post like this there faggot. You wont last long.
>You do realize that both of those UIDs were tranime, right? He made the original post and IP hopped to agree with himself.
Agreeing often leads to what replied to you. they try to keep it going if they think someo9ne beliebs dem.
Expose dem.
Watch how the story changes when they get called.
Godspeed
Feeling… NAKED OPFOR?
Stuck?
Been there.
>>>14115048
>>>14115585
>They are trying to imply that I am Austin Steinbart. That is literally how desperate they are.
>They all know the walls are closing in, and the smart ones who can actually think are saving themselves.
Kek too true.
<Notice how there are not nearly the same number of glowies compared to the early days?
Been a Long time bud.
And I dare a Long Time Coming.
awe shit…
Textbook.
Astroturfing consensus This is a technique that attempts to build a manufactured consensus around a flawed set of statements or compromised information. This is related to consensus cracking, where false evidence is injected in an attempt to dispute or discredit what the current consensus is, and push it towards the desired false consensus. Misleading and false evidence and information are often salted into the evidence pool, with an aim to impede organic consensus building, while also poisoning the available information and evidence.
Cultivating tacit approval (The legal term for this is 'silent agreement') Attempting to attain this state is done using a technique where operators will try to convince the user population to ignore, or not respond to bad information or false assertions. This is done in a bid to reduce push-back against the above mentioned tactics. It's worth noting that the reply filtering mechanism of the boards (which currently can't be disabled without code changes from the site admin) is used as a weapon of sorts in this tactic: Filtering with software prevents anons from defending against seeding bad information and astroturfing consensus. This is why the operators push so hard to condition anons into filtering material they disagree with.
We call That Backpedaling my friends.
Old School Glowfaggotry at it's peak.
Try not to judge yourself too harshly considering we were all just about born into faggotry in some way pretty much.
Godspeed.