AI?
SPLC Gloats, Takes Credit for Permanent Twitter Suspension Of America First Activist Nick Fuentes
"Bye Nick!"
The SPLC and their reporters have gloated about the permanent ban of Nick Fuentes from Twitter following their hitpiece smearing him, taking credit for his suspension.
Nick Fuentes, the America First commentator and host of the weekly show “America First,” was permanently banned from Twitter on Friday, following hitpieces being published by both the ADL, the “Jewish special interest group,” and the SPLC, the far-left pressure group in recent days. As National File reported:
[The ADL’s hitpiece] was posted to Twitter within the hour just before his ban, claiming that he is a “white supremacist leader and organizer” who “traffics in disinformation and division.” In a statement, Fuentes said that “the ADL published a report on me and then I was permanently suspended hours later. That’s what happened,” adding that he would discuss his ban more later on his Telegram channel.
The Southern Poverty Law Center… attacked Twitter earlier this week over the fact that Fuentes was still on their platform, linking him to the Capitol Hill protests. In an email to the SPLC dated January 11th, Twitter admitted that they had not seen “enough violative content” from Fuentes to ban him at the time. “It’ll be interesting to see if the other people mentioned in the SPLC’s article about Twitter’s ’embrace’ of the far-right from two days ago end up getting banned too,” said Ashley Goldenberg, the conservative commentator who was banned from Twitter two years previously.
Following Fuentes’s ban, the SPLC, whose article was far more focused on Fuentes’s relationship and interactions on Twitter than the ADL’s hitpiece, claimed a victory and took credit for his permanent suspension. “Just TWO days after releasing our #TweetingHate analysis by Senior Investigative Reporter Michael Hayden: Twitter has suspended the account of white supremacist Nick Fuentes,” the SPLC tweeted. In an email to National File, Twitter refused to confirm whether the reports from the ADL and SPLC contributed to Fuentes’s ban.
Hayden, who wrote the piece for the SPLC, bragged that Fuentes was “likely to lose significant traffic without Jack Dorsey’s help,” referencing previous comments from Fuentes that Twitter “helped him retain an audience” following deplatforming from other social media sites like YouTube and DLive. However, these comments were made before his own proprietory livestreaming site, AmericaFirst.Live, launched, and before he joined Banned.Video and Gab.TV. The comments from Hayden therefore are likely to be massively overstated.
https://nationalfile.com/splc-gloats-takes-credit-for-permanent-twitter-suspension-of-america-first-activist-nick-fuentes/
https://nationalfile.com/splc-gloats-takes-credit-for-permanent-twitter-suspension-of-america-first-activist-nick-fuentes/
Arizona Gov. Ducey Signs Bill to Prohibit Teaching of Critical Race Theory
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill into law on Friday preventing local governments from teaching critical race theory (CRT), a quasi-Marxist ideology at the center of a cultural tug-of-war between parents and school districts nationwide.
The measure, known as Arizona House Bill 2906, will prohibit “the state and any local governments from requiring their employees to engage in orientation, training or therapy that suggest an employee is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously,” said Ducey’s office in a statement.
The bill was passed in the House 31-25, while the Senate passed it in a 16-12 vote, according to online records.
Ducey signed a separate bill last week that aims to bar the teaching of CRT in schools. The law says that schools can’t teach that one race or ethnic group is superior to another and cannot claim that a person is racist because of their race.
While some critics of the push to end CRT say that it’s not Marxist, others have pointed out that it is an outgrowth from the earlier critical theory, which was originally a European Marxist school of thought.
According to the Legal Insurrection Foundation’s Criticalrace.org, CRT differs from the Civil Rights movement because its proponents “challenge the very foundations of the liberal order, such as rationalism, constitutional law, and legal reasoning.”
“Critical race theorists argue that American social life, political structures, and economic systems are founded upon race, which (in their view) is a social construct,” the site says, noting that CRT is often associated with the so-called “anti-racist” movement. “Systemic racism, in the eyes of critical race theorists, stems from the dominance of race in American life,” it further states, adding that such ideologues believe such systems need to be dismantled.
Other critics, meanwhile, have described CRT as merely the application of Marxist “class struggle” along racial lines, with CRT proponents denigrating white people as oppressors and Western culture as oppressive.
In one instance in Loudon County, Virginia, amid a parental pushback against the school’s CRT curriculum, one father said it “actually increases racial tensions as opposed to bringing people together and treating everyone the same and treating people the way they themselves should be treated.”
https://www.ntd.com/arizona-gov-ducey-signs-bill-to-prohibit-teaching-of-critical-race-theory_640645.html
Facts Matter (July 9): Forensic Audit Officially Triggered in Pennsylvania; Senate Leader Requests All Documents from 2020
In Washington, D.C., a man who was convicted of murder and is still currently behind bars won a local election. He is now a commissioner on a D.C. Neighborhood Advisory Commission.
In Pennsylvania, a state senator sent a letter to several counties, officially triggering a forensic investigation of both the 2020 and 2021 elections—similar to the one currently underway in Arizona.
Lastly, in Wisconsin, the state Supreme Court just rejected hearing a case that sought to ban the use of ballot drop boxes. However, this issue might still get its day in court, as there is a similar case currently working its way up the chain.
Resources:
My Patriot Supply: http://ept.ms/3pQ63Ia
Pennsylvania Audit:
https://ept.ms/3wxtzvY
PA Senator Letter:
https://ept.ms/3AM2usu
Washington DC:
https://ept.ms/2TXmGaf
https://ept.ms/3yNkZuV
Wisconsin:
https://ept.ms/3e32fPZ
https://ept.ms/3r1BPU3
https://www.ntd.com/facts-matter-july-9-forensic-audit-officially-triggered-in-pennsylvania-senate-leader-requests-all-documents-from-2020_640772.html
Are YOU smarter than a 10-year-old? School exam from the 1950s will test you on everything from fractions to punctuation - and it's surprisingly difficult to score full marks
US-based trivia platform Quizly put together exam which was taken by children
Do you think you have what it takes to answer all 15 questions correctly?
You'll need to work out complex maths problems and fill in the blanks for spelling
A tricky quiz sat by 10-year-old British pupils in the 1950s will put your knowledge of grammar and fractions to the test.
The 15 questions are taken from an eleven-plus test, which is sat by some students in England and Northern Ireland in their last year of primary school and is used by some secondary schools which select students based on academics.
The quiz, shared on US-based trivia platform Quizly, will test how much you remember about spelling and punctuation.
Arithmetic questions will also test your maths knowledge - so are your division skills up to scratch?
If you're up for the challenge, then try your hand at the questions below. Scroll down to check the answers - and no cheating!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9769783/Could-pass-1950s-exam-10-year-olds-Fractions-grammar-quiz-tell-smart-are.html
Border Pesticide Initiative Results in Prosecution of 50 defendants for Smuggling Dangerous Chemicals
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/border-pesticide-initiative-results-prosecution-50-defendants-smuggling-dangerous