Anonymous ID: c9941e July 9, 2021, 10:52 p.m. No.14092553   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Informed consent and reproductive toxicity of vaccines (Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein)

 

https://youtu.be/XMxuNvVgxlU

Anonymous ID: c9941e July 9, 2021, 10:58 p.m. No.14092586   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2620 >>2623 >>3363

Cryptocurrency – 100% Control of the Great Unwashed

July 10, 2021

 

I have explained that we know nothing about who created blockchain, but it allows every transaction to be traced. With a credit card, they can tell if you bought something. With Bitcoin, they can tell I gave you money first, and then you bought something. Central banks are moving to cryptocurrency because this will ensure 100% tax collection. The Bank of England was saying that parents will be able to control what their children spend money on. The problem is that the government will control what we too can spend on. Here is the BIS telling you the reality of the future. They want 100% of all transactions taxed. I suppose the girl next door will have to watch your kids for payment in kind — chocolate bars or clothes.

 

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/cryptocurrency/cyptocurreny-100-control-of-the-great-unwashed/

Anonymous ID: c9941e July 9, 2021, 11:18 p.m. No.14092694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2710

>>14092655

 

I hear your need to believe in privacy, at least in terms of transactions.

 

sorry, once (((they))) go full blown paperless to digital, they'll eliminate the competition.

 

this is where they're headed, whether it succeeds, well, that remains to be seen.

Anonymous ID: c9941e July 9, 2021, 11:48 p.m. No.14092840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2857

>>14092759

 

I was trying to stay on point, blockchain is traceable, gov't motivation is to reign in every bit of loose change that's taxable through private transactions, the secrecy is who's behind blockchain and the purpose has been realized by that fat fuck at the BIS.

 

And yes, I understand privacy vs. secrecy.

Anonymous ID: c9941e July 10, 2021, 12:30 a.m. No.14092993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2996

>>14092857

>Good. Now find out why that's important in this discussion. Clearly you aren't following.

 

What I see is an anon full of himself, take a look at your posts and do an honest inventory.

 

BTW I started the discussion w/muh post, then an 'all seeing eye' stepped in as if to correct, conquer and reign down tyranny on the board as you constantly do w/anon's, evidenced by your multitude of bloviating posts.

 

Look at me, look at me, look at me, perpetual mantra circulating like a vid loop over and over and over again.