This is what I believe. I heard a Christian on the radio presenting that the first American patriots were instructed by pastors not to fire the first shot. Self-defense is acceptable, however.
An important question, imo, is how do we handle asymmetric warfare or non-traditional warfare? I have believed for a number of years that mass medication via vaccines is biowarfare. I think that any force used in "requiring" the injections would be grounds for self-defense.
I have not finished watching this yet, but I'm finding it informative so far.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-vladimir-zelenko-discusses-how-covid-19-shots-might-reduce-lifespan_RHBtoCdWzEJflQm.html
Scientific American once had an article about belief in "conspiracy theories". What the author discovered was that when people are brought to believe that one "conspiracy theory" is correct, they tend to subscribe to the entire "corpus" of conspiracy theories.
So..if you get someone to question the vaccine, they will likely question the election, too. If you get them to see there was election fraud they will probably start to question the vaccine, too.
Since the vaccine is obviously killing and damaging people EVERYWHERE, we will probably have an "election truth" movement in mere moments. Literally.
Here's the author:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=_OCIc6UAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=_OCIc6UAAAAJ:lSLTfruPkqcC
And here's a link to the article:
https://seniorcollege.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Conspiracy-theories-2.pdf
I think, looking at the other work by the author, that there was some research going on to manipulate people on line. I find the 55 million quote from the article suspicious, as in Cambridge Analytica suspicious.
"We observed the same dynamics in a study of 55 million Facebook users in the U.S. Users avoid cognitive discord by consuming information that supports their preexisting beliefs, and they share that information widely. Moreover, we found that over time people who embrace conspiracy theories in one domain— say, the (nonexistent) connection between vaccines and autism— will seek out such theories in other domains. Once inside the echo chamber, they tend to embrace the entire conspiracy corpus."
I like this YouTube channel for helping me to understand the catastrophe cycle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-t783yi3TE