>>14100645
>How about Science proving there is No God??
If you had the slightest understanding of science you would know how moranic that statement is…
Also, I'm not claiming there is no God, you're claiming there is one. Burden of proof is on you. Whether you like it or not.
>>14100648
>Saying you don't ascribe to a metaphysics is impossible
I just did. It's not stupid just because you can't grasp the concept.
>You have some notion of what it means "to be", so clearly you have metaphysical commitments.
I am me, like my cat is my cat. It physical, not metaphysical.
>you're coming off as a buffoon.
Likewise.
>>14100650
>do you really believe that the "motive force" the original source of creativity behind that which leads to beautiful music, art, architecture, engineering…originates solely due to the chaotic firings of collections of synapses in 3lbs of brain cells?
It's the best scientific explanation. I'm not speculating and then asserting stuff I have no way of knowing.
Like you guys…