>im ok with that actually
Then you have no say when your faith in government isn't rewarded with the outcome you hope in.
>you glow
if thinking for yourself is glowing, then I will glow on
you rejecting my thought in no way lessens it's veracity, just shows you incapable of hearing differing opinions, your choice.
>Can you repeat that?
How do you conquer a nation with 400 million guns?
You convince them that using them is an act of violence.
Your 1A provides for you your freedom of choice, voice, and individuality.
Your 2A provides you the opportunity to protect that choice.
When you forgo the use of 2A as violence, you surrender your ability to defend 1A.
Our unalienable rights are not granted to us by government, when government infringes on those rights, is the very reason 2A was second.
Q/45 provide that you can have an all out assault on your rights by the government, but that you cannot use those rights to defend or remake your government.
What they are really saying is the government will kill you or imprison you if you try to exercise your rights against the governments will (demand violence).
Republicans and conservatives where chosen for this operation for many reasons, but first and foremost, is the ownership of the majority of those self protection/tyrannical government weapons.
If you choose to be labeled violent, it will be because you waited too long to exercise your rights and are left with no other choice.
You already exercised your voice and the government threw your vote out and appointed whom it chose.
This is the very marker your founding fathers laid for the use of 2A.
If you choose not to assemble and force the government to represent your voice, you are choosing violence and the 2A.
Allowing Q & 45 to placate you and move the ball further down the road will come back to haunt you.
If only we could convince patriots to engage in saving our Constitutional Republic instead of sitting idle while the courts throw out legal challenges to the Q/45 path.
>infiltration instead of invasion
yes, this tactic also works in the heart and minds of patriots who wish to keep what they have in life. Loss for uncertain gains is not a choice for lovers of the world, just ask God, he made it a very large reason many will not be welcomed to his kingdom.
>No, you convince them to use them against each other.
This works on the simpletons and the by hook and crook, but not a real patriot.
Good men act accordingly, they do not wait and buy time to not have to do good.
>Did this quote age well?
nothing the Clintons did aged well.
I knew how fucked our country was the day he was reelected.
and when your research has only provided for the continuation of government criminal activity and a 1 year suspension of K. Clinesmith's law license, how is that working out 6 months into an illegitimate presidency?
>We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Exercising your right to assemble and right to carry do not condone force, you are afraid that if patriotic Americans did assemble while carrying the government would show it's absolute power and force would ensue.
Your fear and placation are duly noted, I never said to use force, those where your words.
>nice fedposting
just an observant homesteader, I would never, have never worked for the government.
I have been on their list much longer that you even thought of of awakening, let alone to wake.
Like a good fed/demonrat you project too much.
> if you or anyone goes rambo, they will isolate you and fcuk you up
your words not mine, I never said go rambo, I said assemble and voice while exercising the right to carry.
Alone you are nothing, why the division is the tool of choice, the only way to show unification after a stolen election is with a unified voice.
The only way to protect that voice is to exercise your 2A to protect that right. If it goes wrong that is on the government and it's enforcers who sided with the illegitimate government and not the free unalienable rights of the people.
If you believe what you wrote you are the one living in fear, I have no fear, I am a sovereign man and refuse to be kept under illegitimate rule, and if that results in death, it is on the unlawful government for wrongdoing not my exercise of free will and unalienable rights.
I wish I could call you a brother, but it seems we answer to a different master.
>And yet you feel the need to IP hop while making your point.
you are a special kind of stupid, the kind the government likes.
11 post to my id, if a hop happened, it happened on it's own.
I bet you cannot admit when you make a mistake though, just like the government, you are not wrong, just in authority.
FAFO