This is interesting.
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/ican-files-opposition-to-facebook-and-youtubes-motion-to-dismiss-its-censorship-lawsuit/
Could Section 230 be used by the government to control speech on tech platforms? In other words, Congressmen such as Adam Schiff could be telling platforms to censor vaccine "misinformation" under threat that if the platforms don't comply section 230 is toast.
I was already aware of Adam Schiff demanding tech platforms censor vaccine information.
https://schiff.house.gov/news/press-releases/schiff-sends-letter-to-google-facebook-regarding-anti-vaccine-misinformation
However, it seems that platforms are complying because of the threat of congressional action on 230 if I understood the statements made by Informed Consent Action Network above.
Informed Consent Action Network appears to me to be alleging that since censorship of vaccine information is not a business guided decision, the tech platforms were acting under government coercion and therefore the suit regarding the removal of ICAN's posts cannot be dismissed. The platforms were acting as censors.