Military was the only way, including later becoming elected politicians, you know, just like how the fucking C_A does it.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Suck it Satanists.
But they are already not banning holohoaxers and pro-vaxxers.
Shocking, appalling, outrageous!
Trump impeachment hoax defense attorneys Sekulow and Dershowitz are Jewish.
Your lame attempts to divide = FAIL
"The extraction, distribution and sell of fetuses must continue!" - Democrat Party
"We must have population control for the black population!" - Also Democrat Party
you're projecting, you're sitting on your ass at a keyboard typing shit on an anonymous image board site.
Buy yourself a mirror and look deeply into your own failings.
Death throes
Q: What's the difference between different people posting different comments under different IDs, versus different people posting different comments under different IDs and being labelled 'gerbil'?
A: The labelers who seek to associate NAMES to what are in fact just pieces of information posted by different people.
Attaching 'names' and 'labels' to anonymous comments is just an attempt to control the narrative surrounding those comments, which is itself done in order to 'justify' ad hominem argumentation fallacies.
Ideas stand or fall on their own merits, who posts them is IRRELEVANT.
IDEAS STAND OR FALL ON THEIR OWN MERITS, WHO POSTS THEM IS IRRELEVANT TO WHAT ARE TRUE ANDWHAT ARE FALSE STATEMENTS
Shat are you going to do? whine moar?
LOL, notice the non-falsifiable method being used by BV.
"This is the facts and if you disagree ThEn yOu'Re oNe oF tHeM"
It's not anon's job to 'counter' and thus become answerable to anyone's attempts to label, group and divide IDEAS based on the backgrounds of their authors.
You are the one introducing ad hominem as far as I can see, because it's not me making accusations of the backgrounds of any anon's comments here. It's coming from you.
I address ideas on their own merits, you are trying to deflect from ideas and turn this into a game of groups divided.
I am just an anon, engaging IDEAS ON THEIR OWN MERITS NOT WHO POSTS THEM.
It's not anon's job to become answerable to your or anyone else's attempt to 'refute' or 'debunk' or 'counter' what are illogical and irrational attempts to categorize and group ideas based on the group affiliations of the authors.
You can keep saying "you're not disproving me, you're not disproving me", but again, THAT IS NOT MY OR ANY OTHER ANON'S RESPONSIBILITY, DUTY, OBLIGATION OR REQUIREMENT.
What you are doing is trying to control the narrative on this board by refusing to do exactly what you're telling anons they're not doing, YOU are not refuting the IDEAS in those shill posts, you are instead trying to 'refute' them by unmasking the backgrounds of the authors.
The Marxists did the exact same thing. Karl Marx couldn't refute the classical economists, so he invented an excuse to ignore them, he LABELLED the ideas as 'bourgeoisie logic' and presented those ad hominems as if they refuted the arguments the classicals made.
Why are you using the Marxist playbook?
This site was doing just fine before you started to push GROUP CONFLICT logic.