shill
division shill go away.
wow I filtered all the shills . . . and there isn't anyone left . . .
I'm being hyperbolic but it's mostly discouragement shills and the 'this movement' types, oh and the psychotic flavered baker psyops and named personas (who are played by shill, and not actually real)
repeating your same psyop from last night, I see.
the 'this movement' shills will challange you and try to get you to agree that it's a movement.
Trump has a movement. there is a real movement.
this is a chat room. not a movement.
vague bait is best just deflected.
but the idea that the US is the savior of the world is an ancient psyop that was played for what, 75 years? and now we have overlords who live oversea and they jet all over the world and cause problems and pay people, with our money, to tell us that they are waiting for us to fix it.
they run this country and keep it intentionally in squabble.
they know who they are.
we watch them. And they keep falling on their swords.
please detail these things, as you sound like you're just spouting out accusations that have no basis in observation. So , he's supposed have 'action' and he 'lacks' it? and he's 'complacent' because he doesn't ? ? ? what doesnt he do to make him that way?
did I come into ths in the middle. Sounds just like a stock bully narrative. you're just making bald and false acusations to deflect?
do I really need to review your other posts?
I'll post this and then review.
> d0a38f
I have audited all four of your posts and have determined that you are a conflict monger.
probably you are promoting violence to defame the board.
I have to report you, I guess . . .
do 'they'?
all this does , anon , is show that unity doesn't exist, even within government.
they can 'label' what they will, and no one agrees with their labels.
One report.
out of tens of thousands.
the names in there , the people who wrote it, hold them accountible if you find fault with their efforts.
there is no group think unified 'they' in government. that is a psyop that bungie boss despots want you to think. in fact each person has their own mind. They can tell bunk when they see bunk
no, anon, 'we' are not responsible. the small tiny group of peaon minds who think that they are in control at university etc ,who keep all the good people down, are perhaps culpable. but the idea of 'national guilt' over their crimes? sorry, anon. that is a failure point of view. It's hard to believe you'd be promoting it.
if you were really 'arsenal guy' ready to defend? why would you take the karmic debt of the doctrinaire sex-cult Marxist control-people who are groomed to be head creep in charge?
you're not authentic. You don't have the personality down correct. No one who I ever met who had an arsenal was like 'Oh , our collective guilt'. It's inauthentic.
there is a list of people who wrote that report. they put their names on it. They are the ones to which you should attend your queries about it.
one group in some small part made a report and you're ready to say it's the whole government gone whoie. Seriously, what other documents have you audited of the government? can you find some that say something else? a document like that one seems to be to be bait. it's produced and put into the system to see who would quote it or try to follow it's guidance?
all in all there are so many many many documents produced, your fixating on this one.
the people who wrote it are known. go talk to them directly.
this board does not condone nor promote violence. you have been warned.
I know bait when I see bait, name dropper of disreputible people's names.
I'd pick apart your argument but you're sliding the bread with your violence narrative and grooming for bad behavior.
seriously you know how horrid you are, but you'll pretend and do the 'who me' thing.
you present an inhosbitible narrative that is unwelcoming in it's poison and baited rethoric. Thus I brush the dust off my shoes and move along.
what nerve? you're a provocateur. I pointed that out.
is that your purpose?
you're a provocateur. you can post Q and you're still a provocateur.
look at you, you love thinking that I'm upset.
PS: you're not Q.
this board does not condone violence. I do not give direction to anon in that regard. you are making up stuff in your head and trying to cause conflict. suggestions of violence are not OK on this board.
so now they have the "you're probably . . ." (make up something) form of conflict mongering.
is that a self portrait?
you're running interference for the one who was suggesting violence?.
you better review all my posts instead of doing the 'who, me?' bit.
you know exactly what you are doing.
I audited your previous posts and you were the one who is polling pepole about their desires for a disaster in a public place.
so that's that. We're done. be gone, shill
I haven't taken any of your guff yet, have I ?
how did you set up the camera with your head stuck where it was? you must have had an assistent.