Is this possibly the person behind that horrible website?????
PICS SHOW MY RESEARCH
Lee Romanov
Toronto, ON
Proven Internet Opportunist (see highlighted part of article)
probably this person:
yeah I think they own both. Did you look at the info I posted? That woman makes all her money doing exactly THIS.
She jumps on trends and extracts income from them online.
I have to tell you .. seeing that website makes me want to give up on this.
fuck it.
I hate that it's a commercial enterprise now, and they will control the message, and they will use it to turn people off.
It's over.
LMAO you have NO idea how this works. do you?
If the movement is co-opted it is co-opted. There's no going back.
IF you wanted to put up a website to make yourself some tidy cash and you already had a host company would you use it or not?
You're right, anon. Of course you are - but if it's a normie in Oklahoma why use a Toronto host?
If it's a normie who is genuinely interested in truth why make money & use the work of the already dubious Corsi & Beanz?
It stinks. If you can't see that you don't belong in research.
yes that would be interesting to know.
many many replies like this which makes me question why.. why the INSISTENCE that these two things cannot be connected?
I look up a lot of websites and have not seen this type of thing before. NOT TO MENTION that this woman is all about capitalizing on trends
AND - why can't she own both the hosting service AND the website ?
You're possibly right but whoever the website owner is should make themselves public .. if they don't then this movement is over.
Any person can just steer the public perception any way they want to.
… In fact, if it's so f*cking cool with everyone here maybe I will start a web site and I'll make sure you all look like assholes who shouldn't be trusted.
Add in some white nationalism shit, etc. Would you like that?
baker the whois search on the 'doUknowQ' thing is bogus.
should remove it from notables if you have it in there.
I'm asking - I'm asking you all what you'll put up with.
You really want to support people doing this?
fine, it's circus time.
Letting you know I asked baker to cut this from notables. If you think it should go back then ask baker not to?
I got insane pushback on this and am now feeling furious & confused, TBH, because I had the same thoughts as you.
interesting…
do we think the research should go in notables? It'll have to go in the next one, likely.
I'm torn. Anons are of mixed opinions but I'll tell you what - the anons who don't like this find are extremely rude & angry (which usually indicates deception, IMO)