Anonymous ID: e2a826 July 14, 2021, 3:43 a.m. No.14120168   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0173 >>0175

>>14120156

>you claim you're in a state of complete unity

I don't remember saying that. Nice try at twisting my words.

We are united though, united against the Satanic minions.

>>14120157

So much hostility over a general statement. Thinking that insults have any effect here is the biggest LARP of them all.

 

Funny how angry you guys get when your tactics are exposed.

Anonymous ID: e2a826 July 14, 2021, 4:18 a.m. No.14120314   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0323

>>14120299

Step back anon/shill. Let go of the emotions for a second.

Look at what i'm writing.

Try and distance it from your prejudices.

Recognize when people are just trying to annoy you with cryptic bullshit.

This is the only time I'll help you. From here on out you're on your own.

<Well back to my shitposting self.

Anonymous ID: e2a826 July 14, 2021, 4:26 a.m. No.14120345   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14120323

>Less opinions

>more facts asshole.

Point to 1 fact you posted this bread.

And no I'm not BV, so that's not a fact.

Oh the hypocrisy. Kek

You've spent 10+ posts arguing with me over a general statement of opinion.

Mostly accusing me of being BV (or one of the other "useless maggots") and using sad insults.

<Tbf, I've moslty returned in kind. We're having fun right?

kek.

Anonymous ID: e2a826 July 14, 2021, 4:43 a.m. No.14120390   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0397 >>0723

>>14120380

>did you forget to take your meds today?

Yes. Hence my keeping up arguing with you.

>see , that is what you do. hows that feel?

It only feels bad if you let it get to you.

>didn't you see it as me putting you down?

No I see it as a sad attempt at turning an argument you lost long ago. Kek

 

>did you take your vitiamins this morning?

Only D

>never forget to floss . . .

NEVER!.

You want to keep going?

Shit. This is some kindergarden level sperging you got going here anon.

Anonymous ID: e2a826 July 14, 2021, 5:32 a.m. No.14120588   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0591

>>14120544

>'you are not OK'

I have no idea if you're OK anon. That's why I am asking/assuming based on what you write.

In the end you can boil any posy down to a "tactic".

I'm not shutting anyone off. If you actually read the conversation you are trying to analyse you'd know that I didn't start this conversation and I only reply when I am replied to.

 

Your tactic is to try and paint an anon as a shill (me) pointing to the few counter insults that I posted as evidence while completely ignoring the other half of the conversation.

Your constant referral to me as 'it' only helps in showing you hypocrisy.

 

See works both ways.