>>14120785

TYEB

Would'a stepped up if I wasn't workfagging

>>14120771 (lb)

>Final post in bread

>Filtered

Kek.

I'll help you out and give you a head start.

Filter me now, and you don't have to see any more of my posts this bread.

>>14120805

You gonna keep this up this bread too?

Think of the other anons. If we eat up all the bread they won't get to talk. Kek.

You decide

>>14120827

>I'm actually a woman

>you're not getting togtfo

Rules are rules anon.

You pre-emptively trying keep your female points don't work either.

Rule is there for a reason.

>>14120840

>Still trying to figure out what the deal was yesterday

But since you felt it necessary to proclaim your female status, you are now reduced to a vagina. And hence, you are not getting the help you wanted. How'd that work out for you?

>>14120852

Who's offended?

Read this ->>14120848

>>14120851

I don't care what your reason is. You fell for the bait. You reap what you sow.

>>14120859

Do you have like a random picture picker script or something.

Always 5, never no rime or reason.

Kek.

>>14120873

Kek

>>14120886

>Your response is approximately 17% HALAL™

And 20% Kosher.

Kek

I like you.

>>14121038

>>14121030

Kek, let's see what's behind door number 1

>>14121060

>>14121065

It's funny that you don't see the irony in you posting that.

>>14121084

If a war is rigged for a certain outcome.

Can you "win" or "lose" it then?

>>14121097

Keep it coming.

Glow! god damnit, Glow harder!!

You are not at full brightness yet.

Kek

>>14121117

Can someone explain to me the mental gymnastics needed to think that the 'vaccines' will protect against a variant that didn't exist when the the 'vaccine' was produced?

>>14121168

>so gor the variants to slip by then the spike protein would have to be sufficient different which I highly doubt.

There are no variants. Not provably anyways.

They can't even prove that there is a novel Corona virus.

Trick questions are trick questions.

>>14121168

>>14121182 (me)

Continued:

How do you produce a vaccine for a virus you haven't even purified?

>>14121196

How do convince people to take a shot that'll kill them, willingly?

Telling them that it'll save them from something they need to take your word for exists?

>>14121198

>This is specifically addressing their argument that the vaccine doesn't work against variants.

But for it to work against variants there needs to be variants? correct?

>>14121215

Dodged the question. So lets try again.

>There need to be variants/mutations that are substantially different

But a variant is still not proven to exist. Hell the virus isn't even proven to exist.

Meaning the whole basis for the conversation is missing.

So again, for the vaccine to work against variants, there needs to be variants right?

Just like, for the vaccine to work against a virus there needs to be a virus, right?