OK, sorry, I thought you were promoting him.
also I'm not too sure that he was as horrid as he seems to be in hindsight. I think I need to go lighter on him because he's been gone a long long time. Obviously he knew some stuff.
But anyway you say 'they' are planning.
Which 'they' do you mean?
Are you sure this isn't just fear porn and you've been fooled by the dark clouds of doubt?
I am so very very sick of seeing the intimate closeup comeon face that really is a phnoto that someone took for a particular encounter, with someone else, and not for general distribution.
the inappropriate come-on face close up.
I'm sick of it.
sick of seeing it.
so that is why when that asshole flavored baker started doing that with is dog . . . I found it particularly revolting.
so of course that just makes them want to post it more. that is how you know that they are shills.
It had a 'son of sam' quality of creepiness.
maybe there are a lot of occultists who understand that one set of them is out of control and they'll be battle against the 'they' that you fear? just because someone has a penchant for fortune telling, and thinks that htey can channel spirits does not mean that they follow of a path of evil.
the ones where a naked raging young woman gives the finger don't seem to bug me. It's just a document of someone's rage, and it's not directed at me, so I feel nothing with it. Funny how the intimate picture for hubby or boy friend photos bug me. the pictures for ex-hubby and brake up exboy friend don't bother me at all. weird, huh?
ought it be this kind of . . . deep sleepy voiced 'oh we did such a great job with this audit?'., ought it be like that?
pedo byte?
ouch we need a better word for that.
you seem to have veered away from a discussion of Theosophists to one about the corrupt HR practices that have been in place in the SW industry for
over 20 years
wow, harsh.
so anyolne who participates is a 'soulless bureaucrat'? they weren't someone stumbling through who managed to survive, and try to make the best of it, and maybe be the 'good guy'.
you never actually worked for the government, did you?
before he dated them?
>>14129417
you're just larping the bigot, right? right.
>>14129430
no formal process of ensuring legibility of those serial numbers. no formal way to know if a singlef serial number shows up on multiple duplicate ballots.
He's a very handsome man and doesn't need the toupee.
At first I thought it was a kippa!