>Hay anons, watch…
When I see someone with a 27 post count bickering with someone with a 31 post count,
I do a Ctrl-F on each ID. As usual, nothing of substance added to the bread, just back-and-forth BS.
I then do an ID+ on both. Comfiness ensues.
>who would be responsible for "recalling the electors" and "decertifying the election"?
The fraud was at the local election level, but once those tallies were used to inform the Electors,
they then transmitted their vote to the Senate in good faith, not knowing the fraud took place.
Then, the Senate counted those Electoral votes, again, in good faith, based on what they
had received from the Electoral College. I'm curious to see if those intervening layers of
certification prevent the fraud from overturning the election. Still mulling that over.