==FREEDOM phone : compare linux"
98% of people download and use it because they hear it's "clean" "free" "open source".
those 98% will ever look at the source, they trust the word on the street.
BUTthere are the 2% that DO look at the source, DO check it for backdoors, trojans…
AND THEY VERIFY IT
-
with actual proof, ACTUAL SOURCE if challenged
"compile it yourself from this source if you think your binaries (apps) are comped."
FREEDOMphone
Here we have this "Freedom" phone, using the same language as linux
98% of the people believing the same "story" will grab it and use it …
the other 2% : WHERE IS THE SOURCE? PHYSICAL PROOF?
'uses a public domain android offshoot' but we're not sharing it (and moreso not sharing OUR MODS) …
UNTIL the source they use is published
and people (the 2%) can verify it
verify no back doors, no leaks, no trojans (exploitable by agencies)
-
and then anyone can grab a verified source and compile it if they wish -
it's NOT "FREEDOM" - it's 100% VENDOR PROPRIETARY LOCK-IN
including LOCK IN to whatever holes / trackers / personal info sharing THEY INSERTED
here doggy, nice doggy, good guard doggy, here's a nice "clean" piece of steak just for you.
Just because THEY SAY it's clean
even when they say FROM public domain source
unless they let you see the insides for yourself
all you have is THEIR word
ZERO, NONE, NADA PHYSICAL PROOF.