TYB
And TYBV for taking care of the split Bakes (legit and shill) right off the bat.
>PB Anon theory less then 10
That theory is lame af.
It doesn't give any reasoning behind the names that were used.
And then at then end acts all smarter than thou about it.
I don't get this one at all unless there's some astroturfing going on.
Hard to say anything without knowing what Jen's FB comments even were.
Jen: Hurr durr loaded question, Peter…
Peter: Well, bitch, wtf? You done said you're monitoring posts which is a nice way of saying spying.
Sounds like you're getting your ass beat pretty bad.
Otherwise, you'd just filter or scroll right on by if you were an innocent uninvolved anon.
I take it back.
It wasn't even a theory.
It was just fill in the blanks with names.
Are you just a brainlet or a shill in on some kind of astoturfing campaign?
That's nice of you, Anon.
But, seriously, I don't get how Peter didn't actually say something like that.
There's no way I could do that job w/o losing my shit over the absurdity of it all.
LAARP
>I didn't know if we had a baker
Wut?
You even tagged his Notes.
Brainlet or shill?
Many such cases this bread.
> I bet she got the riot act read to her afterwards
I dunno I kinda doubt it.
She's tasked with trying to put a spin on what they're doing.
She might get hollered at for not bullshitting the reasoning better I guess.
>No description of who it is or what he's talking about, just hype about his supposed knowledge
Yeah, it's prolly some grifter of some kind.
It was an odd exchange to say the least.
Next bread's Globals will paint the full picture.
>Anon theories