God bless you and keep you from harm, this day and forever.
>>14141964 (PB)
"Russian radioactive torpedo tsunamis" are a devastating psychological weapon. Let us pray that we will never see it used except in YT videos.
>https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/14558205/russian-radioactive-tsunami-torepdo-poseidon-2m39/
“My books are forgeries. Nobody wrote them.”
—Philip. K. Dick, The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick
Autist Time-Slip
“Dick perceived reality as a paradoxical, distorted, and even dysfunctional thing, and he sought, through his
writings, a variety of possible explanations; political, religious, philosophical, psychological, even pharmacological.
One of the very few he didn’t pursue was a neurological explanation.”
—Jonathan Lethem, “My Crazy Friend”
Today Philip K. Dick is seen as a sci-fi prophet, probably the most prominent science-fiction writer of the
second half of the 20th century. Naturally, he wasn’t seen that way in his lifetime: he died in 1982, just
before Blade Runner was released. The main thing Dick is credited with anticipating is the whole
“matrix” surrogate reality idea. Dick was probably the first writer to deal with this mystical concept in
technological terms as opposed to strictly philosophical ones. Dick’s primary preoccupation was twofold:
what is reality, and what does it mean to be human? The second preoccupation naturally overlapped
with technology, most famously in his 1968 novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (which later
became Blade Runner). If machines develop self-awareness, does that make them equivalent to human?
And if human beings lose their capacity for self-awareness, do they cease to be human?
https://boxes.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/wp-content/uploads/How-Am-I-Not-Myself.pdf
For example, the author Richard Dawkins describes, in his best-selling book The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2008, p. 355), his experience at three British boarding schools, all of which “employed teachers whose affections for small boys overstepped the bounds of propriety.” Dawkins adds that, “if, fifty years later, they had been hounded by vigilantes or lawyers as no better than child murderers, I should have felt obliged to come to their defense, even as a victim of one of them (an embarrassing but otherwise harmless experience).” He then warns against “false memories” concocted with the help of unscrupulous therapists and mercenary lawyers.[1]
The view that sexually interfering with children is harmless (combined with the seemingly contradictory one that a patient might invent traumatic memories of such an incident) is of course one that runs through the entirety of this investigation, and which is very much the central argument for those who would exploit children for their own ends—and/or for imagined “social liberation” purposes. Except that, the social engineering programs underway, at least since Havelock Ellis, appear to be based on an even more radical belief, that sexual interference with children is actually beneficial to them, at least some of the time. What’s implicit in Dawkins’ account is that he himself is the proof that these sorts of experience do no harm, being that he is now a successful, award-winning author (and social reformer), and a man of great intellectual prowess.
https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/a-lamb-among-wolves-occult-yorkshire-17/