Anonymous ID: 2727fa July 17, 2021, 11:06 a.m. No.14143539   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3542 >>3620 >>3759

Part 1 of 2

 

Some critical actionable information was dropped in an interview from July 9.We need to get this parsed out into distinct facts.

 

“Dr. Zelenko: 'Life saving information…is being criminally suppressed' by Big Pharma”

https://rumble.com/vjnael-dr.-zelenko-life-saving-information…is-being-criminally-suppressed-by-big.html

 

Around the time that Pres. Trump mentioned HCQ, approximately March 21, 2020, he allegedly requested that HCQ be made available to the public for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Joseph Curl. “Trump Says These Two Drugs Could Be ‘Game Changer’ In Fight Against Virus.” The Daily Wire, March 21, 2020.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-says-these-two-drugs-could-be-game-changer-in-fight-against-virus

 

Question:Can we find an executive order to match Dr. Zelenko’s assertion?

 

Instead, the administration acted to block this from happening.

 

First, this article was created:

 

May 1, 2020. Mandeep R. Mehra, Sapan S. Desai, SreyRam Kuy, Timothy D. Henry, and Amit N. Patel. “Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19 | NEJM.” The New England Journal of Medicine.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007621

 

Then, the NEJM article was used to “revoke Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine.”

 

June 16, 2020. FDA. “Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine,”

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and

 

Question:Had there ever been an EUA for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine? How would this affect the general policy for off-label use?

 

Meanwhile, the NEJM article on which this action was based had already been retracted on June 2. But of course, the anti-EAU still stands.

 

Melissa Davey, Stephanie Kirchgaessner, and Sarah Boseley. “Surgisphere: Governments and WHO Changed Covid-19 Policy Based on Suspect Data from Tiny US Company.” the Guardian, June 3, 2020.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgisphere-who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine

Anonymous ID: 2727fa July 17, 2021, 11:06 a.m. No.14143542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3563

>>14143539

Part 2 of 2

 

Meanwhile, the WHO was also taking action. They created a study in which subjects were given potential lethal doses of HCQ.

 

WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium, ` Pan, Richard Peto, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Marissa Alejandria, Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo, César Hernández García, et al. “Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19 –Interim WHO SOLIDARITY Trial Results.” MedRxiv, October 15, 2020, 2020.10.15.20209817.

https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.15.20209817

 

According to David Jayne, professor of clinical autoimmunity at Cambridge University:

“Hydroxychloroquine overdose is associated with cardiovascular, neurological, and other toxicities, occurring with doses over 1500 mg, and higher doses are associated with fatality.”

David James. “Chris Whitty Gave the Order to Give Alleged Covid-19 Patients Lethal Doses of Hydroxychloroquine to Both Kill Them and Sabotage Trials.” Daily Expose, June 28, 2021. https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/28/chris-whitty-gave-the-order-to-give-alleged-covid-19-patients-lethal-doses-of-hydroxychloroquine-to-both-kill-them-and-sabotage-trials/

Great Mountain Publishing: “Doctors Poisoned Test Patients to Falsely Show that Hydroxychloroquine Is Not Safe and Effective.”

https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/02/15/doctors-poisoned-test-patients-to-falsely-show-that-hydroxychloroquine-is-not-safe-and-effective/

 

The solidarity study resulted in the WHO’s recommendation against HCQ.

Anonymous ID: 2727fa July 17, 2021, 11:26 a.m. No.14143630   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14143563

Are you using zinc and azithromycin with it? The protocol calls for zinc and azithromycin as well.

https://thezelenkoprotocol.com/

 

Also, there are newer protocols that implement ivermectin. Ivermectin has helped people who were thought to be goners.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/One-Page-Summary-of-the-Clinical-Trials-Evidence-for-Ivermectin-in-COVID-19.pdf

Anonymous ID: 2727fa July 17, 2021, 11:51 a.m. No.14143759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3763 >>3786

>>14143539

The major point here is that there was an active effort of subversion to block a presidential order.

 

The workshop was “Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships.” In it, Peter Daszak gave a presentation, “Ranking risk for zoonotic potential of novel viruses.” In this speech, he was quoted as saying,

 

“Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs [medical countermeasures] such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process.”

 

Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses. National Academies Press (US), 2016.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK349040/

 

The implication is that Big Pharma should collude with MSM to create a scare event that will get people to agree with being vaccinated.

 

Do you think perhaps Pres. Trump knew about this and this is why he defunded the EcoHealth Aliance?

 

May 21, 2020. New York Times: "Prominent Scientists Denounce End to Coronavirus Grant"

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/21/health/wuhan-coronavirus-laboratory.html

Anonymous ID: 2727fa July 17, 2021, 11:59 a.m. No.14143807   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14143786

They may have censored a patent as well. I'm not sure how to look this up, but I did find a post where it said that patents relating to PCR tests were classified after the fact. Can someone check into that?