>>14150560

I think the underlying motivator here is for Facebook to get out from under the rumors/suspicions that they are following through on reports from the Bidan regime of which users they need to block.

Psucki and to some extant, Bidan, have pretty much insinuated that in statements to the press. Bidan, for example, by saying that Facebook is killing people, almost serves up a justification for calling for bans. He would have been better off saying, a la Trump. that he doesn't tell them who to ban, but what would be wrong with that if we did? It could very well be saving lives..Bidan may not have the cognitive marbles to sell that complex a correlation, though, and instead, put a shiv up Facebook's ass, intentionally or not.

It really puts Facebook over a barrel against the Trump suit that claims Facebook is taking orders from the government, thus shouldn't have 203 protection. It's also an inkind politcal contribution, IMO.

All this, then, could just be a contrived dust up to try to blow smoke up everyone's ass that the Bidan regime and Facebook ain't kissing cousins.

>>14150678

I live in Europe. I've heard this from people. It's the republicans that are anti-vax. Cut and dry. Easy talking point to sell. Swallowed whole.

That battle won't be reversed with local skirmishes. A literal space weapon has to be dropped on the MSM where the fallout removes any scintilla of credibility attributed to the MSM, past or present.

>>14150852

I think Harris was advising people not to take it, because Trump. No better debunking point than that, if true.

Point is, living in Europe, it's easy to see how people, who don't speak English, are easy to suck in with a designed talking point. Europeans need labels to pin on events, in my experience. There's no way for them to research alternative for a good, sound reason, because they can't speak English, or speak it well enough, and just take any reason that sounds good and run with it.

Either way, we're not going to win that talking point, or any other talking points in a domino theory campaign. Only way now is too destroy the MSM's credibility in one fell swoop on a major issue that's easy for a normie to grasp. The rest of this small change bullshit with go under in the collateral damage.

I think the election steal, provable, with the MSM having foreknowledge and, thus, knowingly complicit will be the thing that turns the tide.