Anonymous ID: 0d9230 July 20, 2021, 5:09 a.m. No.14160066   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0070

>>14160051

That is projection.

 

Nothing in that meme is 'advocating' for ANY 'removal' of ANYONE's posts.

 

It is not a call to remove information, yet, it is information that is itself being removed.

Anonymous ID: 0d9230 July 20, 2021, 5:15 a.m. No.14160075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0081

>>14160070

Nope, it is not.

 

NOWHERE does it 'advocate', 'call for', 'ask', or 'demand' ANY removal of ANY information.

 

You are attributing to a meme talking about a playbook, the actions of a b.v. who is removing information that is 'inconvenient'.

 

And you're projecting, trying to flip it around and accuse the deleted for wanting to delete.

 

You're accusing me of what the b.v. IS doing.

Anonymous ID: 0d9230 July 20, 2021, 5:19 a.m. No.14160085   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14160081

You're still projecting.

You're 'persisting'.

I just posted a meme talking about a playbook.

You're accusing without evidence.

Who accuses without evidence and do they glow?

Anonymous ID: 0d9230 July 20, 2021, 5:41 a.m. No.14160147   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0197

>>14160133

I tend to agree.

 

Selecting the third digit in a timestamp and linking it to a number in a paragraph of a publication on a day that has a Q drop with another number linking to another timestamp, etc, etc.

 

Seems forced, like this: