it was allready found and even the document that is overlayed was found and matched.
not blaming You Anon, i couldn't rememmber what the document was or where to find it, some declassed doc i rememmber, that's all.
Logical thinking, they can be also two persons beeing the same, rank, title or something intierly different.
not a coincidence, Q knows Who He is… if He was the same rank, title or something as Chuck he would use different terms.
there should be a list of <undisclosed reciepientsin the e-mail
He said He is…
In the to: field there should be her e-mail, and the info "undisclosed recepients"
Sorry, just checked, deppends on the program.
no, that would not be there.
But.whoever gave CM the E-Mail eighter was one of the recepients or they have acces to the send box in the send box is a copy of the e-mail including those undisclosed recepients
Seee >>14160140
5.6+5.7 = 11.3
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_5_6_restrictions_on_rights_to_practice/
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_5_7_responsibilities_regarding_law_related_services/
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/
The Russian translation at the bottom of the last link concerns me, anyone did learn russian?