>>14159389 (lb)

>Why is Star Trek economics getting shilled in every bread now?

Is Gene Roddenberry the new savior now?

Oh wait! He's like JFK : somewhat terminally ded.

NEXT !!

>>14159397

>Aluminum is pretty flammable stuff

reminds me back in the school days

• when we were still allowed to play with the bunsen burners -

pinch of Aluminium powder - oooh, pretty!

[teacher steps out] "what happens we chuck a fist full of the stuff?"

(… later "found" a jar of magnesium powder - and even more luckily eyes still working)

>>14159421

>Playing with and discovering properties of chemicals in a school lab now those were the days

going forward this information ~~may~~ WILL become very useful!

OTOH today's "science class" - figuring out pronouns - still not sure how that's supposed to help survive the next disaster.

>>14159441

OK, my point is:

JFK, Gene, and many other's you name had/have very good ideas and insights.

The 'other side' has their own ideas (that anyone with half a brain can see) that are bad.

and where we are at today is the other side dominant and thus implementing their ideas.

1. good ideas are a dime a dozen

2. but without regaining dominance

… less than dreams.

so yeah, suggestion noted, thank you.

but please: no need to keep schilling it to the distraction of achieving #2 (above).

… oh,

[while we still can]: a laugh now and then IS healthy,

sensitivity [particularly in these times] ISN'T - in fact it's a huge detriment.