>>14166573

what I find distasteful about this kind of thing: it explains the alledged strategies of these cretin agencies as if the behaviors of these antisocial people are always wildly successful, and the decision of a crustigenarian thought process of the demonic possessed managers of such 'think tank' type places, as if their thoughts are the only thoughts. And their narrative is the only one that will succeed.

In fact it's just marketting.

they want more money so they appeal to their overlord-funders by writing what the money-bags want to hear.

as they so delude.

the real truth: it's just a nepotocracy. They want to survive. They write the narrative that their clan always succeeds, no matter evil the story seems.

and if you believe they will say 'oh, you paranoid'

the purpose of subjective tenses is to allow for speakers to speak in a metalanguage to allow for doubt or uncertainty about the details, and/or the outcome of such efforts or programs.

and the absurdity of it: 'there will be . . . 3 kinds' and they elevate relays and metal coupling, and a polyfiber frame to the level of a living human being.

human. there is only one kind of worker: human.

and the cyborg or the robot are tools, like a wrench.

the 'you are less' narrative is woven into such as the replied-to poster posts.

what it posts is called 'propaganda'

>>14166587

this sign is from a march in Jan of 202

>>14166602

why is that a 'nazi'?

sounds like any over-the-topic booster for a clan. It could be any clan. Why nazi?

in fact the qualities you describe, which you don't ilke, are common in any kind of control-plain 'overlord' types. Doesn't matter who it is or what nationality: they are corrupted so they seek to be the rulers and squat in the seat of power. And they do as they will and overlord with the qualities you suggest.

however, the idea that it's just 'nazis' is rediculous, given the evidence of those who clearly are not who still behave that way. I could say who (some of them) and use a special word for just that type . . .

in fact that other word better decribes the qualities you suggest. But since it's become a heavy and hard word to use, because it's conflated with everyone of a group, it's a better and more meaningful word. And Faucci seems to be that kind of person.

the 'everyone I don't like is a Nazi and send them to a camp' psyop is definitely tiring at this late date.

it's lazy and it's exploitative. And it's racist and stupid. And it contributes to a fowl narrative that is used by known disreputibles to slander others.

>>14166615

the word of which I speak is on a short list of words that if you use it you will get noticed and watched.

the fact that not all A are B and yet some imagine that all A are B, then we can't use it.

but Some C are B.

the point: the miscrenets tell you their tactics, and the calling of everyone as Nazis is a clear tactic of pepole who are the other word, that describes a personality (control overlordy) type that better explains the behaviors of the liar overlord types.

So they worst case ethnic booster for group (((( are the bad word type. But some call ALL of group (((( by that word, which is clearly not the case.

and in fact it's a 'family' type, not an ethnicity type. And those of that family don't have to be of group ((((. They intermarry.

so if you have a control freak overlord type in your family who controls everyone through bad behavior and demanding pushyness, meanwhile accusing everyone else of the same thing?

they are that bad word type of person.

but all his realatives aren't necessary like that.

but to try to transfer the meaning of it over to the term 'nazi' and then to say everyone I don't like is like that . . . one must question why they do this?

the topic is toxic. It ought to be obvious to asute people what the word is. I try to avoid using it at all. And I would suggest that no one else use it, but call it 'deprecated.'

and if you don't gree with my discussion, or my narrative, and you want to send me to a gulag, or otherwise screw with me, then you would be described by the banned word very well. and yet if I used that word, I'd be seen as promoting a hateful racial stereo type word, even though that personality type exists in very many pepole some of them have never even heard of the . . . . .

>>14166650

you have an obcession with your need to have symbolic meaning.

you are the creep type that Q warned us about.

>>14166672

I figured someone might ask me if it was 2020 or 2002 that I meant.

january of last year.

>>14166675

this kind of post tries to steer the conversation to distasteful topics and echos false assumptions about the power of 'they' who speak to 'sheep'.

obviously this is part of the crap-post flood of posts designed to cast a spell of sadness and hopelessness.

but it always fails.

>>14166700

wasn't that the emperor who put Mars Ultor on the coins and got the armies marching off for him in to an unsucessful war against the Phartians?

>>14166711

doesn't that other word describe that type better?

they are the puke of humanity, sorry.

>>14166731

why are you continuing your 'pet put to sleep' morning narrative?

have another cup of coffee and never repeat such echos again to me.

>>14166752

the inauthentic sad-sap persona that goes on about 'putting down' his 'beloved pet' is as authentic as you are.

when it is obvious, and one understands the swamp through which one passes every morning to be a swamp, and understands that those things that try to grab at my heals, the false narratives put out by the team sent in here to fuck with me, are fake. I get it.

I get it that most of the posts are autogenerated and triggered by other posts, that no real person is there behind the keyboard on some misted mountainslope in their happy home localle.

It's a server farm script, designed to make you Sad (sad) or upset.

or to train you that it's OK to use asshole speak like various putdown words, and slurs, and to talk about demographics of others in a crass and dehumanizing vocabulary. Or to pretend to be ruling class old-elite-guard asshole child so it's OK for them to go on with their false explanations about groups who are falsified, for the most part, and usually unknown.

it's tiring and I do it only a little now adays as the board is useless for the most part. most of the posters useless, as I have said, and NEVER even post a link ever but , as I also said, try to lap at my heels as I pass through in a localle that they make into a swamp.

but I'm like the avitar who swings through the trees that will grow in such ap lace. High above the mud of you, shills who pretend they are 'sad' about their pet. Did I mention he was saying he was sad about his pet?

OK, I'll stop.

>>14166784

this one uses two word nominative clauses in a turrets-spaination styel. It's a bot training others to think in super jade and hyper callus, and mostly false, nominative clauses.

they aren't just corrupt, they are also pedos.

no one talks like that.

if you do you are a marked person and will not do well at the public debate

>>14166808

cool, so you won't even see this

when someone is actually saying real things then they put out the 'anyone with more than no posts is filtered'

>>14166810

the 'all about Nazis' narrative goes on and on and on and on.

what other groups did that too?

what are the other groups? or do you just know about what you call 'Nazis'?

can you not see

how limited and false your narrative really is?

>>14166819

hold those that do what(?) to high standards?

'high' as in kite-headed?

or 'high' as in snob-minded?

or high as in 'altitude'?

I have found that if you use the word 'high' and talk about elevation and wind-speed at the same time . . . that can be for some very confusing copy (even the samples in the grammar book seemed wrong, oh so very wrong, when they talked about how winds were high on the mountain.

were they 'high-winds' on the mountain, or just everyday winds way up at a high elevation?'

so, anyway , Hi.

>>14166833

I grew up and heard real kids tell me real stuff about their families so I don't need to hear it from you.

>>14166841

no one can not see how false the nazi narration is from these pukes farming their falisity to who whom they considered dupes or lowlife sheep.

we can not see

how they go on with it all day.

"I knew real nzais onece."

we've lived in side of their psyop explanations for a very long time.

we simply don't need anymore helpings of 'naziboy reveals his real story'.

as if every Sazzi we ever met we didn't immediatelyknow. And they always think we are fooled by them.

as if I know.

how could I.

no one who is really that would chat about it online anyway.

they are so obviously fake.

>>14166856

the theory is that some fraidy-cat jews larp as nazis to gain an edge?

interesting?

My thought on it is that we can't really know who the larpers are, or what their position or status is within whatever agency it might be, human or alien or foreign or off in an ai jungle, like a carnival ride carrosel at a fun-time summer highway stop exhibition lot, by a river perhaps, or built up on a foot ball field or vacant lot for a week at a time.

we can't know who they are.

they want us to think that they are something, so they larp as that.

but in fact . . .often it's like they know nothing at all about the people of whom we are supposed to imagine, the represent as if they are their family too.

they aren't authentic as that ethnicity. There is only the hurtful part, the dark heart, that only shows up if you're a bitch to them, or they are under stress. there is none of the joy that is usually clearly there on the surface. There is no self-deprecating folly and 'who me' hambone comedy that makes fun at their expectations. They simpley aren't human. There is no joy in them.

they take the worst case bitch face 'bit' that people do and try to present that as if that is all of that group, when clearly that's only a few.

and only when they are in a bad way for a reason, they, too, have been psyopped.

so, ya, I say the fat spokesparrot is a jerk for being such a bitch like he is, but in fact, I find him to be fascinating and basically good hearted, but with that dark flaw of using hyperbolic explanations when humanism would be better.

but he feels he faces a dark evil foe.

to say that he sees that in eveyrone? that's over the top.

so ya, you say 'wow he's a cool guy, I don't like his point of view, and he takes it to extreame.'

but in fact he's an attentitve and wise man with a mostly good heart.

and the shills never get that part

that we don't 'hate' those who think we see them as enemies.

>>14166937

this are no qanon, and thus there are no 'qanon parents'.

fail

>>14166886

>>14166956

buttt they're magical techniques of conformance shilling and psychological methods crafted by really really smart dead people from a 100 years ago that are soooo effective that they keep telling us about them.

>>14167111

team gets a confirmation from dog-post flavored baker. What are anon to think?

do they think 'dement shill posts word dement first use and gets confirmation flavored dogbaker post?

you could provide a list of your 'plausible assumptions' but I think your stock in traide is just the bald innuendo.

'what do you mean'

what do you think I mean?

"what do you think I thnk you mean"

that is the quality of your discourse.

what plausible assumptions can anon draw from your psycho babble.

that you are a psyop operator sent here to do your conformance shilling board-submission dog comms and flavored baker constant discord smear campaigns, as you do everyday.