52e51b is irl craycray
>>14166586
what I find distasteful about this kind of thing: it explains the alledged strategies of these cretin agencies as if the behaviors of these antisocial people are always wildly successful, and the decision of a crustigenarian thought process of the demonic possessed managers of such 'think tank' type places, as if their thoughts are the only thoughts. And their narrative is the only one that will succeed.
In fact it's just marketting.
they want more money so they appeal to their overlord-funders by writing what the money-bags want to hear.
as they so delude.
the real truth: it's just a nepotocracy. They want to survive. They write the narrative that their clan always succeeds, no matter evil the story seems.
and if you believe they will say 'oh, you paranoid'
the purpose of subjective tenses is to allow for speakers to speak in a metalanguage to allow for doubt or uncertainty about the details, and/or the outcome of such efforts or programs.
and the absurdity of it: 'there will be . . . 3 kinds' and they elevate relays and metal coupling, and a polyfiber frame to the level of a living human being.
human. there is only one kind of worker: human.
and the cyborg or the robot are tools, like a wrench.
the 'you are less' narrative is woven into such as the replied-to poster posts.
what it posts is called 'propaganda'
>>14166615
why is that a 'nazi'?
sounds like any over-the-topic booster for a clan. It could be any clan. Why nazi?
in fact the qualities you describe, which you don't ilke, are common in any kind of control-plain 'overlord' types. Doesn't matter who it is or what nationality: they are corrupted so they seek to be the rulers and squat in the seat of power. And they do as they will and overlord with the qualities you suggest.
however, the idea that it's just 'nazis' is rediculous, given the evidence of those who clearly are not who still behave that way. I could say who (some of them) and use a special word for just that type . . .
in fact that other word better decribes the qualities you suggest. But since it's become a heavy and hard word to use, because it's conflated with everyone of a group, it's a better and more meaningful word. And Faucci seems to be that kind of person.
the 'everyone I don't like is a Nazi and send them to a camp' psyop is definitely tiring at this late date.
it's lazy and it's exploitative. And it's racist and stupid. And it contributes to a fowl narrative that is used by known disreputibles to slander others.
>>14166629
the word of which I speak is on a short list of words that if you use it you will get noticed and watched.
the fact that not all A are B and yet some imagine that all A are B, then we can't use it.
but Some C are B.
the point: the miscrenets tell you their tactics, and the calling of everyone as Nazis is a clear tactic of pepole who are the other word, that describes a personality (control overlordy) type that better explains the behaviors of the liar overlord types.
>>14166648
So they worst case ethnic booster for group (((( are the bad word type. But some call ALL of group (((( by that word, which is clearly not the case.
and in fact it's a 'family' type, not an ethnicity type. And those of that family don't have to be of group ((((. They intermarry.
so if you have a control freak overlord type in your family who controls everyone through bad behavior and demanding pushyness, meanwhile accusing everyone else of the same thing?
they are that bad word type of person.
but all his realatives aren't necessary like that.
but to try to transfer the meaning of it over to the term 'nazi' and then to say everyone I don't like is like that . . . one must question why they do this?
the topic is toxic. It ought to be obvious to asute people what the word is. I try to avoid using it at all. And I would suggest that no one else use it, but call it 'deprecated.'
and if you don't gree with my discussion, or my narrative, and you want to send me to a gulag, or otherwise screw with me, then you would be described by the banned word very well. and yet if I used that word, I'd be seen as promoting a hateful racial stereo type word, even though that personality type exists in very many pepole some of them have never even heard of the . .