Anonymous ID: 7a9a40 July 21, 2021, 6:08 a.m. No.14166878   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14166814

>Dr. Christine Grady

 

As more COVID-19 vaccines become available for healthcare workers, nurses may want to seek guidance in deciding whether to receive the vaccine. Gathering information from reliable resources and considering the ethical elements involved can help ensure that your decision reflects your knowledge and values.

 

AACN President Elizabeth Bridges spoke with Christine Grady, a nurse bioethicist and a senior investigator who currently serves as chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, about the ethical considerations involved in making decisions about COVID-19 vaccination, including the hospital's obligations and relevant provisions from the Nursing Code of Ethics. View the video and the transcript below. You can also review “AACN Statement on COVID-19 Vaccination”.

 

Christine Grady: Healthcare organizations of course have to figure out the who, what, when, where, and how of vaccinating employees and patients eventually. I think ethically the complicated place that we're beginning is because there is insufficient amount of vaccine for everyone who might appropriately be vaccinated. As many of you know, there've been a number of groups who have spent some time over the last several months – including the National Academy of Science and Engineering and Medicine, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices that advises the CDC, the Strategic Advisory Committee of Experts for the WHO, and a number of academics – to sort out a framework for ethically allocating vaccine, appreciating or anticipating that at the beginning, we won't have enough.

 

Christine Grady: They all sort of agree on the main values, which is kind of interesting, the main values and goals of ethical allocation. That the primary value should be maximizing benefit. Reducing disease, reducing serious disease, but that that's not the only principle or value. The other ones are making sure that we pay attention to how to keep society running in ways that preserve function. Another one is paying attention to equity, and the kinds of disadvantages that are showing up, and how we can address or mitigate them in terms of allocating vaccines. All of these are really important and very useful values that guide the determinations that healthcare organizations are going to have to make, or are making. It's interesting too, though, that it doesn't stop there.

 

Christine Grady: Once you say “maximizing benefit,” who comes to the top of the list are healthcare providers. And especially health care providers who have contact, direct contact with patients who are in high risk occupations in terms of their contact with patients, maybe exposure prone procedures, and activities. Critical care nurses are way at the top of that list. Healthcare organizations have to make further granular decisions about, okay, among the healthcare workers that work in our institutions or institution, how do we prioritize them? Who gets the top priority? How do we roll this out in a fair way, over time as more vaccine becomes available? How do we protect the staff that we have, and give them the option of volunteering to be vaccinated?

 

full interview

https://www.aacn.org/newsroom/covid-19-vaccination-ethical-considerations?sc_camp=63037852B2D54339B90A09A8F1F38011

Anonymous ID: 7a9a40 July 21, 2021, 6:21 a.m. No.14166929   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14166872

>Meanwhile the MSM and democrats are all pushing the lie that only unvaccinated people are getting sick.

 

Tis fucked up. Made it through the first half keeping the parents (in their 90's) safe. Now, we are right back to square 1. But, but, but, we need the vax to stay safe… it's the unvaxed… duh, Delta is really bad… Fox is saying…

 

The MK is strong in weak minds. TG I was adopted.

Anonymous ID: 7a9a40 July 21, 2021, 7:08 a.m. No.14167161   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7170 >>7260 >>7265

Oklahoma man arrested after 12-year-old arrives at Tulsa hospital 9 months pregnant

 

An Oklahoma man has been arrested and charged with first-degree rape for allegedly impregnating a 12-year-old girl.

 

Juan Miranda-Jara, 24, walked into Hillcrest Hospital in Tulsa July 14 with a child in mid-labor, FOX23 reported.

 

Doctors called police, telling them they had a rape victim and Miranda-Jara was arrested. Miranda-Jara had reportedly told officers he was the father of the child and appeared not to understand what all the fuss was about.

 

"They walked in just like any other couple would, excited to deliver their newborn child," Tulsa Police Officer Danny Bean told FOX23.

 

Fox News has reached out to the Tulsa Police Department seeking further information but did not hear back before publication.

 

The details of Miranda-Jara’s relationship with the 12-year-old girl are not clear at this time. Investigators are trying to piece together how Miranda-Jara was able to impregnate the girl and how that pregnancy carried through to full-term without anyone alerting police.

 

"We know there are many people in the community who are shocked by this, grossed out by this, disturbed by this, have questions, a whole range of emotions," he said. "But in time, we will be able to give the community the answers they want. We just don’t have all the answers right now to give them, and we don’t want to compromise the investigation that’s still happening and really just now getting started."

 

Miranda-Jara is being held on a $50,000 bond. His first court date is set for August 26. Bean said it’s possible Miranda-Jara could face more charges depending on the outcome of the investigation.

 

Online records do not list an attorney who could speak on Miranda-Jara's behalf.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/oklahoma-man-arrested-12-old-020805574.html