Q is not a person!!!

Q was an operation of Military Intelligence to put some heat into the system, to stir things up, and to get people thinking and researching for themselves, to generate more heat!

The first law of thermodynamics states that the change in internal energy of a system equals the net heat transfer into the system minus the net work done by the system. In equation form, the first law of thermodynamics is ΔU = Q − W.

Here ΔU is the change in internal energy U of the system. Q is the net heat transferred into the system—that is, Q is the sum of all heat transfer into and out of the system. W is the net work done by the system—that is, W is the sum of all work done on or by the system. We use the following sign conventions: if Q is positive, then there is a net heat transfer into the system; if W is positive, then there is net work done by the system. So positive Q adds energy to the system and positive W takes energy from the system. Thus ΔU = Q − W. Note also that if more heat transfer into the system occurs than work done, the difference is stored as internal energy.

>>14171563

If Q is positive, then there is a net heat transfer into the system

How do you understand whatQ+means?

Can you see how the size of this crowd,

All cheering for the hated Trump

Added HEAT to the SYSTEM?

We Are Q

The People United are theHEAT

>>14171586

Look what all that HEAT is doing to the enemy!!!

They want you DIVIDED!

They call us names.

They make threats.

They censor.

They lie.

They project.

They cheat.

They steal.

They harm.

They are sick.

They are evil.

At some point the streets (for them) will not be safe.

Q

>>14171602

Human history as fractal: How patterns repeat at all scales in our shared past and continue to shape the future

http://seshatdatabank.info/fractal/

Fractal patterns are found within mountains, crystals and galaxies – and everywhere else in the natural world. Is human history mind-bogglingly fractal too? I think it is; and it might change the way you see the world.

What is a fractal? A fractal, like the Mandelbrot Set, is a mathematical equation. It describes patterns that repeat simultaneously at all scales in detail. Now let’s find them in history.

The ‘Mandlebrot Set’ is the traditional illustrated example of a fractal.

Human progress

First, perhaps we can see long-term human progress as a fractal. Social improvement occurs in a rise and fall pattern: something-like ‘two steps forward’ and ‘one step back’.

If the amount of human cooperation that exists can be considered a good proxy for progress, consider the historical evidence for changing levels of societal cohesion.

‘Secular’ cycles, highlighted in the work of Turchin and Nefedov, suggests the rise and fall of social cohesion in a state generally lasts a couple of generations to two-hundred years. There are longer cycles. Ibn Khaldun in 1377 wrote for the perspective of whole civilizations. He coined the term ‘asabiyya’ for social cohesion.

Source: Wikipedia

Source: Wikipedia

Over the shorter-term Elliott waves – visible, for instance, on a market price chart – track the rise and fall of modern economies. The shortest Elliott waves last mere minutes and may impact society through the changing value of the currency or stock.

Lastly, consider our life experiences and why our cultures contain proverbs that caution against hubris and over-confidence. “Look before you leap!”

Evolution and war

What other social processes are fractal? The evolution of society might be, and warfare too – one of cultural evolution’s important selective mechanisms.

In biological life the lowest observable level of evolution is at the gene but extinction and selection also occur at higher levels: the cell, organism, and taxonomic group.

Source: Wikipedia The original image showed the multiple levels in biological evolution.

Source: Wikipedia

The original image showed the multiple levels in biological evolution.

In humans the lowest level is the family. Likewise, extinction and selection occur at higher levels than this: friendship-groups, communities, ethnicities, races, nations and cultural regions.

The ‘War on Terrorism’ was an attempt at group extinction and how the doctrine was expanded is a powerful illustration of the fractal nature of the group.

Level 1: Terrorist.

Level 2: Terrorist cell.

Level 3: Terrorist group (collection of cells).

Level 4: Terrorist networks (groups).

Level 5: Terrorist states.

The US war on Iraq in 2005 eliminated a whole state – but not before the Bush Administration declared a Level 6: “Axis of Evil”.

Understandably, war – an important mechanism of the cultural evolutionary process which is fractal – is typically fractal, but rarely do we appreciate the extent this is true.

We usually think of wars as ‘short term’ campaigns (months), battles (days), and theatres (hours). Yet wars occur at huge timeframes – a 100-years-war, or even thousands of years.

One of history’s most epic wars was between Asian Steppe nomads and agriculturalists from about 1000 BCE to 1500 CE. The settled people eventually won but Genghis Khan almost wiped out civilization in Central Asia.

The return of an ancient enemy. Source: Wikipedia

The return of an ancient enemy. Source: Wikipedia

Here’s another war story: from c500 BCE to 1500 CE Eurasia was always at war with Oceania. First the Greeks, then Macedonia, Rome, the Byzantines, and finally the Vatican went to war against Persia in the Middle East.

As part of an extended war, we can perhaps understand why the Crusades were ordered 400 years after the Arabs spread Islam and after the Islamic Caliphates. It was the Persian Seljuk invasion of the Levant in the late 11th Century that provoked action.

Like the lengthy Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage (partly over control of tin supply from northern Europe), this very extended Persian-Mediterranean war may have partly been caused by the presence of a major trade route, called the Silk Road.

>>14171588

NO, of course not!!!

That info is classified.

What is not classified is thatYOU THE PEOPLEhave to rise up and take what is yours.

The Establishment DeepState doesn't have the heavies of MS-13 any more. The Giant Hornet assassins have been prevented from sending reinforcements. You now have the floor and can safely protest, gather, and show howUNITEDyou actually are.

Find someone who speaks Arabic and ask them what SOFA COUGH means. Then ask them if COVFEFE means something similar.

Then think of Trump at a Saudi sword dance and what he actually heard there.

That message is for you too.

>>14171680

A new world of ABUNDANCE is coming

And we must adjust our society to fit it.

Strange Attractors and Society

http://www.calresco.org/wp/attrsoc.htm

Introduction

Social systems are invariably complex, they do after all contain many people, doing many things and each having many values and interests. In traditional science it is usual to assume that all questions have "an answer", and it is the task of the scientist to analyse the system until they find it. Yet in complex systems such simplicity is not the case, such systems have many answers thus we must look to new techniques in order to deal with them. One of the newest findings in dynamical systems theory is the existence of what are called 'strange attractors', these are areas of state space that won't stay still, that refuse to be predictable - despite often being completely deterministic. The forms that such attractors can take and how we can regard them, in relation to social systems and behaviours, is the theme of this essay.

The Strangest Spaces

The following illustrative collection of strange attractors appear from nonlinear interactions of only three variables, from a formula of this form:

M( t+1 ) = a * M(t) + b * I ( t ) + c * R ( t )

I ( t+1 ) = d * I ( t ) + e * R ( t ) + f * M( t )

R ( t+1 ) = g * R (t) + h * M( t ) + j * I ( t )

If we equate M with money, I with ideas and R with resources then we have a very simplified model of an interacting human dynamic, central to business practice. Lorenz Strange AttractorsThat such a model behaves chaotically is clear, what is not so clear normally is that the form that the 'strangeness' can take is exceedingly dependent upon the 'constants' used (a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h & j - but note that in the 'real world' there is no such thing as a 'fixed' constant, that is just a mathematical simplification). For many values of these constants (which could be quite complex functions of several parameters) we will find a fixed attractor - a single point of convergence (where M, I and R take fixed long term values), but the slightest change to any constant can force a move to any one of these strange attractors, the system 'bursts' into life (in the following pictures, all generated using J.C.Sprott's Strange Attractor program, sa256.exe, M is the x-axis, I is the y-axis, and R the z-axis colour coded into 256 shades, the 4th dimension is of course time - the sequence of 3D space points plotted). Within each of these SAs, the values cycle over the three dimensional state space, changing from iteration to iteration, moving in jerks ('quantum leaps') as well as gradually, and in some cases fragmenting into disjoint sub-attractors which (like the Lorenz) often 'escape' onto another 'wing' and later return.

Alternation between Modes - the dynamics of attractor change

We stressed initially the instability of strange attractor forms to parameter changes, so we would Self-Organizing Barriersexpect that if we have multiple interacting attractors (that 'combination' type) then they will be changing each other's parameters and thus their shapes. In fact, studies of complex dynamical systems have shown that what happens (typically) is that areas of state space that are unstable become stable, and areas that are stable simultaneously destabilise. There is thus a two way coevolution between modes moving from 'order to chaos' (barriers dissolving - the creativity of 'art'), and modes moving from 'chaos to order' (barriers forming - the rationality of 'science'), yet they swap places over time - what was 'known' becomes 'uncertain', what was 'uncertain' becomes 'known'. This finding is very relevant to social systems, and we can see this dynamic everywhere we look, most clearly perhaps in politics where oscillations between 'Right' and 'Left' occur at regular intervals, the policies of the party in power decending into chaos, whilst the opposition position stabilises and gains control of the ordering process following an election.

The net result is that the system self-organizes to attain a dynamical balance, which we call 'edge-of-chaos', where different areas of the system exist in different states, Mandelbrot Setso that attempts to reduce such systems to one behaviour overall are doomed to failure, we must accept that 'sets' of diverse dynamics always simultaneously exist, reminiscent of the diversity of features and attractor types present in the structure of the Mandelbrot Set. As an example of the changes that a parameter alteration can make to attractor structure, we show below 3 attractors, based upon one varying parameter, 1.79, 1.81, 1.89 (i.e. changes of about 1%, followed by a further 4%). That such small alterations make such big differences to form (a move from 'disjoint winged', to 'excluded middle', to 'dense') needs to be read in context with the fact that in social systems it is extremely rare that any personal parameter is known to a genuine accuracy of even 5%, or has a 'standard deviation' indicating that such a narrow spread of views exists !

>>14171876

Just Another Strange Attractor

https://longsworde.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/just-another-strange-attractor/

Browsing around the pages of The Guardian this morning, I came across this beautiful award winning photo of an “oscillating microbubble” (whatever that is) that clearly has the characteristics of a Strange (or Lorenz) Attractor, otherwise known as “Butterfly Effect”. It clearly shares the same features as the Holling’s Adaptive Cycle — the pathway that energy follows in any selected ecosystem, or the dynamics of any system for that matter. I’ve even suggested, tentatively, that it may show the path of energy through the right and left hemispheres of the divided brain, for example. At the same time, though, it uncannily takes the form of the traditional symbol for infinity.

Here’s Holling’s Adaptive Cycle

And here’s Dr. Dario Carugo’s photograph (from The Guardian) of the “oscillating microbubble”,

As you can see, both take the form of the traditional symbol of infinity (called the lemniscate), as described in the Wikipedia.

Does anyone have more info aboutSen. Rand Paulbeing assassinated?

This is something that happens to too many doctors who do not kowtow to the profit needs of Big Pharma.