I think I have an answer for why people in certain professions are under heavy pressure to get "vaxxed": The DS no longer wants them. Stew Peters mentioned this idea, and no matter his credibility on other things or not, here I suspect he was right.

In yesterday's WSJ there is a letter to the editor (WSJ, 7/21/21 p. A14) entitled "The Tech Industry Between America's Coasts" by Joe Lonsdale. Who is Joe Lonsdale? According to the bio he is "a cofounder of Palantir, Addepar, and OpenGov, is a general partner at 8VC and chairman of the Cicero Institute."

Why does Mr. Lonsdale's letter show me that the DS wants to eliminate certain workers? Well, here's one quote: "Our venture-capital firm, 8VC, invests in Digital Diagnostics, which developed the first-ever FDA-approved computer-vision diagnostic algorithm–in which a computer fully replaces a physician."

Just my take: If you are in a profession which is under heavy pressure for vaccine/gene therapy compliance consider whether or not there is AI or robotic technology out there that can replace whatever it is you do or if there are government obligations (pension, Social Security, etc) that would decline if you were eliminated.

If you want a future that involves fully functional men and women you will have to quit your cult membership. Mankind does not operate well under authoritarian control. We were made in the image of God, so our free will is critical in our interactions with others. Words like "must", "required", "mandated" are clear signs you are in a tyrannical zone. Please don't think that letting yourself become an enforcer will lead to your own freedom. If you are a doctor, nurse, or pharmacist being called upon to push the "gene therapy" jabs please understand that your "masters" will expect you to take them, too. And when you are gone they will be able to replace you..with a machine.

>>14172692

Good for the refusers. They win in the end.

I just posted about this:

>>14172700

Here's the thing about zoonotic disease. We are learning that viruses don't randomly "jump" from species to species absent interference from man. I know I was raised on the idea that when people go into jungles and such they may acquire "new" diseases from animal sources. In a way this may be true, as Europeans in the Amazon for example, might begin to be exposed to diseases that are capable of infecting humans but are new to them. However, the idea that some virus happily infecting bats (and designed to do so) is going to rather randomly "jump" species and start a pandemic among humans, is I think an idea wholly made from "cheese cloth". You need a deliberate effort to engineer the virus directly or multiple tissue passages where mutants can be cultivated to desired virulence. Random zoonotic jump is bunk, I believe. A lie promoted to hide the tracks of very wicked scientific efforts towards eugenics and population control.