I know it's a notable
but
"roseanne goes ayy lmao" always gives me a good chuckle.
Anons, this is exactly why our instructions were to always ignore shills/clowns and never to engage them.
I am not saying anyone is definitively a clown or a shill, however, the strategy is sound if only for one reason:
For too long, humanity has allowed others to be the gatekeepers of information. We put the decision and power to censor into the hands of someone who are other than ourselves.
Are we not here because we realize the error in having a talking head give us their biased thoughts on information we can read and digest ourselves?
Are we not here because we realize the error in having someone else decide what should be censored and what should not be?
Yes, it is important not to engage clown/shills as to not activate any of their bot programming, however, it is more important to not engage because it is a personal decision.
A decision that you are not forcing upon others.
Ignore, filter if you must, but I would think it's foolish to engage in any type of censorship unless otherwise noted by Q. That's the game the cabal plays.
Also, if you are really that concerned about looking like a "conspiracy theorist", then you probably aren't ready to be here, tbqhf.
Ever hear of the Heart Attack Gun?
http://www.military.com/video/guns/pistols/cias-secret-heart-attack-gun/2555371072001
So, what's the question? It's late, so I may be a bit confused. They could easily have someone shoot her with the gun unnoticed. Even someone within the department if they died at work. Even easier if they died outside of work.