Their need for thier symbolism? I apologize for all the pasta and grammar in advance.
pb→ https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14172067.html#14172834
pb-→ https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14172067.html#14172843
pb–→ https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14172067.html#14172822
cor·o·na·tion
/ˌkôrəˈnāSH(ə)n,ˌkärəˈnāSH(ə)n/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: coronation; plural noun: coronations
the ceremony of crowning a sovereign or a sovereign's consort.
"the Queen's coronation"
Similar:
crowning
enthronement
enthroning
accession to the throne
investiture
anointing
inauguration
Origin
late Middle English: via Old French from medieval Latin coronatio(n- ), from coronare ‘to crown, adorn with a garland’, from corona (see crown).
sauce–→>https://cpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.bristol.ac.uk/dist/c/332/files/2016/01/Paulus-2017-From-Charlemagne-to-Hitler.pdf
From page 2 pasta
The fabled Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire is a striking visual
image of political power whose symbolism influenced political discourse in
the German-speaking lands over centuries. Together with other artefacts
such as the Holy Lance or the Imperial Orb and Sword, the crown was part
of the so-called Imperial Regalia, a collection of sacred objects that
connotated royal authority and which were used at the coronations of kings
and emperors during the Middle Ages and beyond. But even after the end of
the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the crown remained a powerful political
symbol. In Germany, it was seen as the very embodiment of the Reichsidee,
the concept or notion of the German Empire, which shaped the political
landscape of Germany right up to National Socialism. In this paper, I will
first present the crown itself as well as the political and religious
connotations it carries. I will then move on to demonstrate how its
symbolism was appropriated during the Second German Empire from 1871
onwards, and later by the Nazis in the so-called Third Reich, in order to
legitimise political authority.
The crown, as part of the Regalia, had a symbolic and representational
function that can be difficult for us to imagine today. On the one hand, it
stood of course for royal authority. During coronations, the Regalia marked
and established the transfer of authority from one ruler to his successor,
ensuring continuity amidst the change that took place. This was especially
important because royal authority in the Holy Roman Empire was not, at
least de jure, hereditary. Instead, rulers were elected by a committee of socalled prince-electors, the Kurfürsten. The Regalia therefore symbolically
and actually established authority with a person who was not necessarily of
the blood royal. But apart from that they also had a religious function that
went beyond the mere transfer of secular power. Royal authority in
mediaeval times was closely linked to the concept of divine justification,
what in German is called ‘Gottesgnadentum’, the divine right of kings, or, in
other words, authority by the grace of God. In that sense, the Regalia stood
for the connection between secular and divine authority but they were also
an embodiment of that authority. The Regalia guaranteed royal power even
more than the king or emperor himself or than his blood and dynasty.1
They
were sacred objects which granted the ruler’s authority divine justification
but also emphasised that even the king was subject to the laws of god.2
Accordingly, up until the twelfth century, it was not even possible to keep
separate the conceptual notions of divine power and royal authority.