This is actually exactly what most whites are doing right now… Absolutely fucking nothing.
It's hard to even wanna fight for my people anymore. Why? They don't even want to fight for themselves and want to give their nation away to DIE-versity… I'd rather fight for my family and my family alone. We'll never sell-out.
Well said, anon…
But again, I still believe this does not answer my question.
Let me premise it, further.
Do you agree that laws cannot be enforced without violence or the threat there of? If so, how can you also support a stance of pacifism, or non-violence? (assuming you support the non-violent stance of those who run this board).
I know… It's truly fucked up, beyond belief. Thank Biden and Kamala for promising them the world.
Because isn't it true that you cannot have a functioning society without laws? And laws are just words without enforcement. And enforcement can only happen through violence or the threat of violence (being forcefully detained/jailed IS violence, FYI).
So… I hear everyone here yelling, "LOCK HER UP"… Yet, also advocating for non-violence. Is this a semantics thing? Do people here really not understand that violence is 100% necessary for a society to function at all??? (In the sense that laws are being properly enforced).
See the graphic… It explains well.
"We wuz kangs…"
MJ12 mean, "Majestic 12", supposedly a super-secret gov't group that studies alien/extraterrestrial shit.
If an Anon is mentioning MJ12 or MJ12 larpers, it won't be long before they are telling you your horoscope and educating you on lizard-people.
Yeah, I stopped doing that in 2018, bruh
Literally evidence of him lying to Congress and helping cause the death of millions… And is free as a bird.
Must be part of the plan, huh guys?
Eh… That site is about as functional as a mentally-retarded child, anyway.
Okay… Sauce?
Reminds me of a Hannity, "Tick tock", which inevitably results in a nothing-burger.
Regardless, WE HAVE TONS OF EVIDENCE, of all sorts of shit… That isn't the problem… The problem is ENFORCING THE LAW.
You guys can show all the evidence you got, but it won't change a thing, until you stop handing that evidence to the very same kinds of people and expecting them to do something.
Our Supreme Court is corrupt AF… And it trickles down.
>I appreciate you.
Likewise.
>I believe the supreme laws of the land cannot be understood without the belief that others will do what is necessary to preserve them. This is not an offensive position. This is a position in defense of the right to life, liberty, and property (happiness); which is the truth of the constitution at its core.
Agreed.
>Provocation form external invaders or domestic infiltrators (traitors) would justify the appropriate response, and lending assistance to your neighbor in defense of their rights under the same governance is wholly justifiable in the constitution.
Agreed.
And, do you believe these provocative conditions have been met, so as to justify the dutiful American citizen to respond accordingly (i.e. through the use of violence)?
>Why do you think PDJT is adamant on being a counter-puncher? The law permits the enemy just enough slack to fuck their own selves in accordance with the law of the land. This the reason for the long game.
It sounds nice, in theory. But the picture looks far more bleak, I posit. I think our nation has a major corruption problem, in our courts, law enforcement, intel agencies, and now the military. The sad fact is, the law is NOT being enforced. And I think this fact is obvious to everyone. There is a clear double-standard at play. Regardless, what can the people do, besides resort to violence, when their nations institutions, created for addressing their grievances, have been eroded through corruption and politicized into weapons against them?
I'm all ears…
>Castle doctrine, anon. This realization is dependent upon the individual response to the specific case of infringement. Without a template for due diligence, there is lawlessness where confrontation is mandatory to defend constitutionally declared God-given rights.
Agreed… However, I would argue that, that "template for due diligence" is our now corrupted gov't / justice system…. Hence, doesn't the American citizen have a right and duty put off such tyranny? I would say so.So would Jefferson, I presume.
>you have to reach a point where faith in humanity keeps doubt of self in check in the event that collective awareness leads to end-result of a more positive and inspirational outcome for generations to come.
No, I don't have to do that. I do not have faith in humanity any longer. Some individuals, sure. But collectively, as a whole. Hell no. And fortunately, I do not doubt myself and instead am rather confident in my abilities… I think I understand your sentiment. I just don't agree.
>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
That's fine and dandy. I don't want anyone advocating violence or doing violence here on this board… I want it done on our enemies front lawns.
THE FBI PROTECTS CHILD MOLESTERS AND I HAVE UNDENIABLE PROOF OF THIS.
No one cares.
BULLSHIT… ALL real Patriots want the kikes responsible for 9/11 brought to justice.
Google Earth gets down like that???
1 Minute till the McAfee countdown video, anons… Tune in