dChan
Anonymous ID: 843e5f July 22, 2021, 9:30 p.m. No.14179283   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9315 >>9414 >>9447

>>14179169 (lb)

>And? Aren't those right being encroached upon?

Are you familiar with the concept of castle doctrine, anon?

 

>Agreed.

5:5

 

>Eh… You didn't really answer the question.

I disagree. The entire purpose of the 2nd is in defense of the 1st. The 1st being the sole purpose of the preservation of the Republic that could not have been formed with acceptance of the most crucial of amendments establishing, clearly, the soul of the Republic's purpose and struggle for the sake of humanity and journey for hte truth of purpose of our collective mind(s).

 

In short:

2nd = The sake of the 1st.

1st = The sake of Republic.

The Republic = The sake of humanity's journey.

 

The defense and preservation of the Republic rests in the public conscious trusting and realizing that which is not seen but assumed to be by our brothers and sisters in voluntary arms, and the engagement of The People in public debate of that which attempts to challenge the public perception of doctrines subverted by institutional knowledge.

 

Speaking of which, look at all this willful participation in this experiment of ours. Apparently, you and I aren't alone in challenging perception and seeking ways to agree upon progress of everyone's way of life.

Anonymous ID: 843e5f July 22, 2021, 10:16 p.m. No.14179496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9558

>>14179414

>Well said, anon…

I appreciate you.

 

>Do you agree that laws cannot be enforced without violence or the threat there of?

I believe the supreme laws of the land cannot be understood without the belief that others will do what is necessary to preserve them. This is not an offensive position. This is a position in defense of the right to life, liberty, and property (happiness); which is the truth of the constitution at its core.

 

Provocation form external invaders or domestic infiltrators (traitors) would justify the appropriate response, and lending assistance to your neighbor in defense of their rights under the same governance is wholly justifiable in the constitution.

 

Opinion:

Why do you think PDJT is adamant on being a counter-puncher? The law permits the enemy just enough slack to fuck their own selves in accordance with the law of the land. This the reason for the long game.

Anonymous ID: 843e5f July 22, 2021, 10:45 p.m. No.14179631   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9640 >>9645 >>9680

>>14179558

>And, do you believe these provocative conditions have been met, so as to justify the dutiful American citizen to respond accordingly (i.e. through the use of violence)?

Castle doctrine, anon. This realization is dependent upon the individual response to the specific case of infringement. Without a template for due diligence, there is lawlessness where confrontation is mandatory to defend constitutionally declared God-given rights.

 

>It sounds nice, in theory. But the picture looks far more bleak, I posit.

That is a matter of perspective and trust. It's a team effort, and providence is a team effort of disparate talents willing to take the risk (leap of faith) that the cogs of their efforts spin the machine of progress of the human condition. In other words, you have to reach a point where faith in humanity keeps doubt of self in check in the event that collective awareness leads to end-result of a more positive and inspirational outcome for generations to come.

 

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

Anonymous ID: 843e5f July 22, 2021, 11:03 p.m. No.14179706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9716

>>14179646

>surely the conditions have been met.

<The reminder for the conditions to understanding our constitutional rights in defense of life, liberty, and property have been met. Same as going to history class, anon.

 

I didn't vote for him because he represented a rejection of the norm. I voted for him because I think he probably thinks like I do. Not trying to be a dick, but that's a level of intellectual engagement that's been vacant since all my life.