Anonymous ID: 42724e July 23, 2021, 5:04 a.m. No.14181018   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1024 >>1027

>> 14178491 – (PB) Dashboard connected directly to VEARS data in Snowflake

 

https://vhme.org/

 

Something doesn’t seem to be adding up correctly or maybe I am misunderstanding the data….

 

The top graph, Adverse Events by Vax Date, shows 4105 deaths in 2021, 233 in 2020

 

The bottom graph, Pre/Post COVID Vax Deaths, shows 9537 deaths

 

Other than that it gives a great overall picture

Anonymous ID: 42724e July 23, 2021, 5:56 a.m. No.14181316   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1410 >>1605

Hearing for EXAMINING RECOMMENDATIONS TO REFORM FISA AUTHORITIES (2014)

Serial No. 113-62

 

Couldn’t find anything on this in QResearch

 

Some excerpts….

 

“On January 17th, President Obama also announced his desire

to transfer the query approval of metadata from the NSA to the

FISA court. I am interested to hear from today's witnesses

whether such a reform will, in fact, result in greater privacy

protections without weakening national security.

 

President Obama also endorsed additional privacy

protections for foreigners overseas. He instructed the Attorney

General and Director of National Intelligence to take the

unprecedented step of extending certain protections that we

have for the American people to people overseas. Specifically,

President Obama called for limiting the duration that personal

information about foreign nationals is stored while also

restricting the use of this information. Is it wise to restrain

our national security agencies by extending to foreigners the

rights and privileges afforded Americans?”

 

“For the first time, the public understands that our

Government is engaged in widespread domestic surveillance. This

surveillance includes, but isn't limited to, the Government's

collection of records on virtually every phone call placed in

the United States under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act.”

 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg86549/html/CHRG-113hhrg86549.htm

 

balkanization – FISA

 

In addition, the pending legislation continues to rely, at least to some degree, on the location of the surveillance target. For now, that may be the best we can do. For the long run, however, we may need more radical change. If the government genuinely cannot determine a person’s location, it makes no sense to use geography as a trigger for FISA’s warrant requirements. In those circumstances, a geographical approach will always be too broad or too narrow – treating all communicating parties, or none, as if they were in the United States.

 

https://balkin.blogspot.com/2008/06/guide-to-new-fisa-bill-part-ii.html