>Does anyone else feel like that?
It's the symbolism behind them that struck some nerves, for certain.
It's not that hard to understand. They want to make anons look stupid, and attach this nonsense to anons/Q. Anything to stoke the "kooky conspiracy theorist!" nonsense.
>A sugar daddy web site linked to the federal probe says the GOP lawmaker never had an account on the site.
So Scott Adams calls in a favor to a person at the consulate, and essentially Matt Gaetz gets a bad rap? Any guesses from anyone which consulate Adams called?
I've given Matt a lot of shit, but appearances can be deceiving as fuck, so there ya have it. I think it's pretty obvious, or at least should be, that he's not what they are trying to paint him as.
Should've done this a long fucking time ago, so sure; why the fuck not on a Friday?