> glaring contradiction
Learn the comms:
This is not a game.
Learn to play the game.
oh, are you the anon making these? i think you posted one about A.Mack yesterdaty night/this morning, can you repost? thanks/sorry if mistaken
>>1419070 fake and lame
>>1419051 yeah it's crazy, eh, almost like you have to read and think for yourself what's worth your interest/time
>confusion
>doubt
shills gonna shill.
most anons just sit back, read and understand the crumbs on their own, and let the chaos burble along like a moat of idiots and shills protecting their comfy fortress
>Whats the point of doing this over and over?
clear slide, just look at it harvesting pointless replies… fucker
>>1419152 that's good
>but not use a more secure and reliable way?
uuuuugh, so tired of this.
that's your take on it, you have no way of knowing it really is "more secure".
try wearing a skimask in a walmart while shopping: no one can see your face, but will they wonder who the fuck you are and why you're masked?
(the answer is yes. yes they will.)
for weeks anons pushed a damn MegaSuperDuperSecureCustom trip made just for Q.
he never used it.
we don't know all the opsec, the methods, the patterns, the motives.
we don't need to.
for more answers, and not just to entertain a slide/conversation, go re-read crumbs related to "plausible deniability".
just go re-read the crumbs, already, there's dozens of answers to that question in there.
it's not gone
weblinks have their // in italics to prevent linking
it won't work of you noobcopypaste
(how many times do we have to explain this daily?)
learn more, anon
you're slowing us down