Anonymous ID: 8e8319 July 24, 2021, 8:56 a.m. No.14188841   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ouch!

 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/after-biden-says-he-wants-to-ban-handguns-politifact-says-it-s-false-that-biden-wants-to-ban-handguns

 

Supposedly nonpartisan fact-checking org Politifact ran interference for the Biden administration this week, falsely claiming that Biden did not say he wants to ban handguns during a recent town hall.

In spite of the fact that Biden, in his own words, clearly indicated a desire to ban at least some handguns, Politifact decided to rate this claim as "false."

 

In explaining their reasoning, Politifact stated: But regardless of the definition, neither term includes all handguns.

 

For example, the Sig Sauer P365 was ranked the most popular handgun in a 2020 survey of Alabama gun dealers. The NRA's Shooting Illustrated Magazine named it the Handgun of the Year. The standard magazine for the P365 is 10 rounds, and depending on the model, the weapon can accommodate a 15-round magazine.

Nothing Biden said would curtail the purchase of the Sig Sauer P365. Nor would his policies touch any of the 15 standard handguns in the Alabama survey. It is possible that some models of pistols would be affected. There are designs that bridge the gap between handgun and rifle, and are built to accommodate larger magazines. But they represent a subset of firearms, and barring them would not constitute a ban on all handguns.

 

White House web page.

Reasonable people can disagree about whether the House GOP should be blamed for falsely implying that Biden said he wanted to ban all handguns, even though they did not say that. They did include video of the president's remarks, so people could see for themselves what Biden said. But while it would be false to say or imply that Biden stated he wanted to ban all handguns, it is equally false to imply, as Politifact clearly did, that Biden did not say he wants to ban some handguns.

Anonymous ID: 8e8319 July 24, 2021, 10:47 a.m. No.14189312   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://wikileaks.org/hackingteam/emails/emailid/48334

 

NSO technology “allows remote and stealth monitoring

and full data extraction from remote targets devices

via untraceable commands,” the slide says.

 

Francisco Partners bought the company for $110

million this spring, a person familiar with the deal

said. Francisco, which didn’t return repeated requests

for comment, has invested in companies such as Blue

Coat, whose product include Internet filtering tools.

 

A key selling point: NSO claims it can help monitor

smartphones of people targeted by government agencies.

 

One person who recently saw a demo by the company

said its technology silently took over a BlackBerry

device. On LinkedIn profiles, its engineers also claim

an expertise in Google’s

and Apple’s

mobile operating systems.

 

7:00 am ET | Aug 1, 2014