Anonymous ID: 44f602 July 25, 2021, 10:04 a.m. No.14196681   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6692

>>14196670

Moar anons like you should find backchannel comms like you.

Everything has meaning.

4 images, What does each one represent?

Image info like image size even has meaning.

That's just naming a few.

Anonymous ID: 44f602 July 25, 2021, 10:33 a.m. No.14196811   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6839

>>14196785

>Plenty of 'big picture' know-it-all bs being perpetually spouted.

 

>Very little specific well discerned breakdowns have taken place tho.

 

You perpetuate a misunderstanding of not only how comms work, but not have understanding MEANING under proper context. When done wrong or incomplete you miss the meaning as well as context.

 

Why does it have to be communicated this way?

 

WHY are we here?

Anonymous ID: 44f602 July 25, 2021, 10:55 a.m. No.14196902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6926

>>14196839

>You just keep spitting out generalities.

 

>If you can do this at least once you won't be considered a typical Board Blowhard that most ignore (based on the lack of Anon engagement with posts like yours).

 

The argument of downplaying the importance of what you call "spitting out generalities" is incorrect. What does having an understanding of comms provide? It's in the drops. What's the importance of KNOWING what /ourguys/ are saying to us under NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS?

Why even attempt to downplay such an importance especially when there is so much more you could [whine] about in what's posted on this board?

 

So IGNORE back channel communications is your argument?

 

Why are YOU here?

Anonymous ID: 44f602 July 25, 2021, 11:07 a.m. No.14196947   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14196926

That's a non-argument.

If you believe there is very little digging, WHY are you here?

 

I'm going to just you're just going to sidestep the questions asked and reinstate your verbal gymnastics on top of ad hominem attacks "generalizing" when anons attempt to decipher communications towards us.

 

Do [shills whine]?